Ultraheliseade

This compliance-conditions document only sets out the mandatory administrative rules (no joint bids without Form 3, no conditional offers, Form 1 & 4 required, business-secret justification, etc.) for submitting a tender for an ultrasound device and its service package to Ida-Viru Central Hospital, but it gives no technical specifications, qualification thresholds or award criteria, so bidders must wait for the full tender dossier to decide whether to bid.

This is a 100% price-only tender for two lots of ultrasound equipment (general/gynecological and general/cardiac) plus maintenance—mandatory requirement is simply to submit the lowest compliant bid on Form 4, with no technical or qualification scoring, so only ultra-low-cost suppliers should pursue it.

This open-procedure Estonian tender by Ida-Viru Central Hospital (ref. 299655) seeks the supply of an ultrasound device together with mandatory on-site maintenance & repair service, allows bids on up to 2 lots, and will assess bidders solely through the standard ESPD self-declaration on exclusion grounds and general company/technical/financial capacity—no further mandatory certifications or minimum turnover are specified in the published document.

Ida-Viru Central Hospital (Estonia) is buying a high-end general/gynaecological ultrasound system (est. €116k ex-VAT) whose mandatory spec sheet demands ≥24M digital channels, 1TB SSD, 27" 4K OLED monitor, full accessory set and proven compliance documentation, bundled with a 36-month warranty plus a priced 48-month post-warranty service/remedy package (est. €36k), so only vendors that can supply factory-certified devices meeting every listed technical requirement and commit to the long-term service pricing should bid.

The document is a legacy-format Word file (HAD Lisa 2 Hankelepingu vorm) that contains the draft procurement contract for Sihtasutus Ida-Viru Keskhaigla’s “Ultraheliseade” tender, but its limited extractability prevents immediate confirmation of mandatory technical specs, supplier qualifications or evaluation criteria, so bidders should request the authority’s clarifications before deciding to bid.

Legacy-format “HAD üldosa” file contains no extractable technical specs, qualification thresholds, mandatory criteria or evaluation rules for the Sihtasutus Ida-Viru Keskhaigla “Ultraheliseade” procurement—bidders must await published tender documents to decide whether to bid.

This legacy Word document (Vorm 1 Hankemenetlues osalemise avaldus) appears to be only the standard Estonian “Application to Participate” form for the Ida-Viru Central Hospital’s open procedure to buy an ultrasonic unit plus its maintenance/repair service, so it contains no mandatory technical specs, qualification thresholds or award criteria—bidders should wait for the full tender dossier before deciding to bid.

This legacy Word document (Vorm 2 Volikiri) is simply a blank “Power of Attorney” form that bidders must complete and sign—no equipment specs, qualification thresholds, or evaluation criteria are included—so treat it as a mandatory submission template and look elsewhere in the tender file for the actual ultrasound-device requirements.

This legacy Word document (“Vorm 3 Volitus Ühispakkujad”) is only the mandatory power-of-attorney form that any consortium bidding for the Ida-Viru Central Hospital’s ultrasonic-unit supply-and-service tender must submit, so it contains no technical specs or qualification criteria—just the requirement that joint bidders must legally authorise their lead participant.

This is only the blank price-offer form for Ida-Viru Central Hospital’s procurement of a general/gynaecology ultrasound unit plus 36-month warranty service and 4-year post-warranty maintenance; no mandatory technical or qualification requirements are stated, so bidders should already have the full tender specs and simply insert their unit price, service rates and spare-parts allowance to compete on total cost.