Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Trowbridge Town Council Legionella-testing og -overvåking.

Åpen
Frist
15 dager igjen
mai 01, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
024013-2026
Verdi
£54,000
Sted
South West England, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 08, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 17, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 24, 2026

Frist for innlevering

mai 01, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

mai 31, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£54,000
Varighet
36 måneder
Sted
South West England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Trowbridge Town Council inviterer kompetente og kvalifiserte entreprenører til å gi tilbud på levering av legionellamonitorering og -testing på syv sentrale rådssteder for en innledende periode på 3 år med mulighet for forlengelse i ytterligere 2 år.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

17 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (8)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (5)
Finansiell (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit a Financial Cost Statement: Detailed breakdown of annual monitoring.
--Submit a Technical Proposal: Methodology for testing and electronic logbook management.
--Submit Experience: Evidence of similar contracts with local authorities or public sector clients.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly stated in the tender document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be competent and qualified contractors.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Provide a schedule of temperature and legionella testing based on attached risk assessments and asset lists.
--All work must be carried out in accordance with British Standard BS7592.
--Comply with ACOP L8 and HSG 274.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Detailed breakdown of annual monitoring costs.
--Financial Proposal (Price) weighting is 50% of the evaluation.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
024013-2026_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
024013-2026_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
024013-2026_official.pdf

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Legionella testing and monitoring is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable evaluation weighting. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and detailed evaluation methodology beyond the weighting.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices for a below-threshold open competition. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure is clearly defined. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, though the contract start date is very close to the submission deadline. No disputes are indicated.

Klarhet80/100

The description of services, scope of works, and required submission documents are clearly outlined. The specific sites and regulatory compliance standards (ACOP L8, HSG 274, BS7592) are well-defined. The evaluation weighting is provided, but the specific criteria within 'Quality & Operational Capability' are not detailed.

Evaluation criteria beyond weighting are not explicitly detailed.
Fullstendighet70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, the content of attached documents (Appendix A) is not accessible, and the 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are missing.

Content of attached documents (Appendix A) is not available.
Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is an open competition, allowing all competent contractors to bid. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation weighting is provided, promoting transparency. Site visits are offered, and contact points are clear. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender specifies e-submission is likely implied by standard procedures but not explicitly stated. A document URL for the full tender package is not provided. The contract start date is very close to the submission deadline, which might pose a practical challenge for the winning bidder. Financing information is not detailed.

No explicit mention of e-submission platform or process.
Document URL for full tender package is missing.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented, although the contract start date is very close to the submission deadline.

Contract start date is very close to the submission deadline.
Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding requirements, which are standard in many modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Styrker

Clear description of scope and technical requirements.
Well-defined evaluation weighting.
Open competition procedure.
Site visits offered for clarification.

Bekymringer

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria beyond weighting.
Inaccessible content of key attached documents.
No explicit sustainability or innovation criteria.

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria for 'Quality & Operational Capability'.
2. Make all tender documents, including appendices, fully accessible.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation criteria if applicable.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline