Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Carisbrooke Primary Fase 3 Tak, Teknikkrom og Brannsikre Dører

Åpen
Frist
7 dager igjen
april 24, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
012472-2026
Verdi
£360,000
Sted
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 09, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

februar 11, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 17, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

juli 26, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£360,000
Varighet
2 måneder
Sted
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
64
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Fullføre takoppgraderingen ved å erstatte de gjenværende delene, fullføre arbeidet i teknisk rom etter kjelbytte og utskifting av brannsikre dører

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

7 krav på tvers av 2 kategorier

Innlevering (1)
Teknisk (6)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-04-24T00:00:00.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Ability to perform construction work as per CPV Category 45000000.
--Capability to complete roof upgrades by replacing the remaining sections.
--Capability to complete plant room works following boiler replacement.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
012472-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about a planned tender by the Isle of Wight Council for roof upgrades, plant room works, and fire door renewals, including a link to the official planned procurement notice on Find a Tender.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
012472-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides machine-readable information about a planned procurement notice from the Isle of Wight Council for roof upgrades, boiler room works, and fire door renewals.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
012472-2026_official.pdf

This is a planned procurement notice from Isle of Wight Council for a construction project to upgrade roofs, plant rooms, and fire doors, with an estimated value of £300,000 and a tender submission deadline of April 24, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

64
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender exhibits good foundational information and transparency regarding value and timelines, but is significantly hampered by the critical absence of evaluation criteria and lack of electronic submission, impacting clarity and fairness.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined and appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, which is a minor transparency gap, and some codes (Type, Procedure) are not populated. The submission deadline is reasonable from today's date.

Missing reveal date
Missing Type/Procedure codes
Klarhet60/100

The project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fullstendighet65/100

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and key deadlines are provided. The tender documents are also listed. The primary deficiency is the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental component of a complete tender package.

Missing evaluation criteria
"Liable Person" field empty
Rettferdighet60/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the technical requirements appear generic, not tailored. The submission deadline provides reasonable time for preparation. However, the absence of evaluation criteria creates a significant transparency issue, potentially undermining fair competition. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access and efficiency.

Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Document access is implied through OCDS data. The main practical drawback is the explicit lack of electronic submission, which can increase administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

No e-submission
Datakonsistens80/100

The tender generally exhibits good data consistency with no reported disputes or suspensions, and logical dates. Most key fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include a slight difference in the submission deadline timestamp between the timeline and AI-extracted requirements, and some empty code fields.

Minor date timestamp inconsistency
Empty "Liable Person" and Type/Procedure codes
Bærekraft20/100

The tender documentation does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear project description and technical requirements
Transparent disclosure of estimated value and key timelines
Use of OCDS data for machine-readable information
Reasonable submission deadline from today's date

Bekymringer

Critical absence of evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission option
No explicit mention of sustainability (green, social, innovation) aspects
Missing reveal date and some unpopulated fields

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fair competition.
2. Implement electronic submission to enhance accessibility, efficiency, and reduce administrative burden.
3. Integrate sustainability considerations by exploring opportunities for green, social, or innovation clauses.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline