Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Internasjonale ekspertkonsulenttjenester

Åpen
Frist
7 dager igjen
april 22, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
6996042
Verdi
€110,041
Sted
Lithuania, Litauen
Publisert
april 08, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 18, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 15, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 22, 2026

Anbudsåpning

april 22, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€110,041
Varighet
24 måneder
Sted
Lithuania
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€694,267
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
2.6
Konkurranse
Lav
SMB-vinnere
89%
942 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Gjenstanden for anskaffelsen er konsulenttjenester fra en internasjonal ekspert eller et internasjonalt ekspertteam, levert basert på erfaring oppnådd i utlandet (utenfor Republikken Litauen), ved implementering av prosjektet 'Utvikling og testing av en betalingsmodell for personlige helseinstitusjoner basert på oppnådde resultater'.
EU-finansiert

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

65%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender seeks international expert consultation on developing and piloting a results-based payment model for healthcare institutions. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating deep expertise in healthcare financing, payment reform, and international best practices, coupled with a clear understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare context. Leveraging the lack of specified evaluation criteria to proactively define value and impact will be crucial.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Proven International Expertise in Healthcare Payment Reform: We bring unparalleled global experience in designing and implementing innovative, results-based payment models that drive efficiency and improve patient outcomes.

Tailored Solutions for the Lithuanian Context: Our approach is grounded in a deep understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare system, ensuring practical and sustainable solutions that address local challenges.

Commitment to Measurable Impact: We are dedicated to delivering tangible results, creating a robust framework for performance-based remuneration that aligns with the goals of the Valstybinė ligonių kasa.

Sentrale muligheter
Proactive definition of evaluation criteria and value proposition.
Leveraging the 'international expert' requirement to showcase unique global insights.
Focusing on the 'creation and testing' aspect of the payment model.
Sentrale utfordringer
Lack of specified evaluation criteria.

Develop a proposal that clearly articulates how the bidder's solution will meet and exceed the likely objectives of the contracting authority. Proactively define and present a framework for measuring success and impact, demonstrating a clear understanding of what 'results' mean in this context. This can be presented as part of the technical solution.

Potential for strong competition from established international consultancies.

Differentiate by highlighting specific, relevant case studies and demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare system, rather than just generic international experience. Emphasize the synergy between global best practices and local applicability.

Ambiguity regarding specific technical and financial requirements.

In the absence of detailed requirements, assume standard best practices and provide a comprehensive, well-structured proposal that covers all logical aspects of such a project. Use the 'Proposal Form' (5_Pasiūlymo forma.docx) and 'ESPD-request' (2_EBVPD) as guides for the expected structure and content.

Ideell leverandørprofil
A consultancy firm or consortium with a proven track record in international healthcare policy reform, specifically in designing and implementing results-based financing (RBF) mechanisms for public health systems. The ideal bidder will possess a team of highly qualified international experts with direct experience in similar projects in EU or OECD countries, and a strong understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare landscape, its challenges, and its stakeholders.
Sentrale krav
Demonstrated experience in developing and piloting results-based payment models for healthcare institutions.
International expertise and experience gained outside the Republic of Lithuania.
Understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare system and its specific context.
Ability to provide a team of qualified international experts.
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements (though not specified, assumed to be standard).
Viktigste differensiatorer
Demonstrated success in implementing similar RBF models in comparable healthcare systems, with quantifiable improvements in efficiency and quality.
A deep understanding of the Lithuanian healthcare financing and operational landscape, including specific challenges and opportunities.
A highly experienced and cohesive international expert team with proven collaborative capabilities and a strong track record in knowledge transfer.
A robust, data-driven methodology for both the creation and testing phases of the payment model, with clear indicators for success.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
Commitment to knowledge transfer and capacity building for Lithuanian healthcare professionals and policymakers throughout the project lifecycle, ensuring sustainability of the developed model beyond the contract duration. This can be framed as enhancing the 'social impact' of the project by empowering local stakeholders.
Fokusområder for anbud
Technical Solution & Methodology

Given the lack of specified criteria, this will be the primary area to demonstrate value. Focus on a clear, phased approach for developing and testing the RBF model. Detail the analytical tools, data requirements, stakeholder engagement strategy, and risk management plan. Emphasize innovation in the model design and a rigorous testing methodology.

Expert Team & International Experience

Showcase the depth and breadth of international experience of the proposed team, specifically highlighting experience in results-based financing, healthcare economics, and public health system reform. Provide detailed CVs and highlight relevant past project successes. Ensure the team composition directly addresses the project's objectives.

Understanding of Lithuanian Context

Integrate insights into the Lithuanian healthcare system throughout the proposal. This can include acknowledging current payment mechanisms, identifying key challenges, and demonstrating how the proposed model will address these specific issues. This shows a tailored, rather than generic, approach.

Price

While not explicitly weighted, a competitive price is always important. Ensure the price reflects the value and expertise offered. Avoid being the cheapest if it compromises the quality of the proposed solution or team. Justify the proposed costs based on the scope of work and the caliber of expertise.

Anbefalinger6
Develop a Proactive Evaluation Framework
KritiskMye arbeid

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, create a robust framework within the proposal that outlines how the success of the project will be measured. This framework should align with the likely objectives of the Valstybinė ligonių kasa and demonstrate how the proposed solution will deliver tangible, measurable results.

Establishes a clear value proposition and demonstrates foresight, guiding the evaluation process.
Showcase Deep International Expertise with Local Relevance
KritiskMye arbeid

Emphasize the 'international experience' requirement by providing specific examples of successful RBF model implementations in comparable healthcare systems. Crucially, demonstrate how this global knowledge will be adapted and applied to the unique context of the Lithuanian healthcare system.

Directly addresses a core tender requirement and differentiates from generic international consultancies.
Highlight Team's Collaborative and Knowledge Transfer Capabilities
HøyMiddels arbeid

Beyond individual expertise, emphasize the team's ability to collaborate effectively and, importantly, to transfer knowledge to Lithuanian stakeholders. This ensures the sustainability and local ownership of the developed payment model.

Adds significant value beyond the immediate project deliverables and builds trust.
Thoroughly Analyze Provided Forms
HøyMiddels arbeid

Scrutinize the 'Proposal Form' (5_Pasiūlymo forma.docx) and 'ESPD-request' (2_EBVPD) for implied requirements and expected submission structure. Ensure all sections are completed accurately and comprehensively, even if specific requirements are missing elsewhere.

Ensures compliance with submission procedures and provides a structured basis for the bid.
Integrate Capacity Building into the Solution
MediumMiddels arbeid

Propose specific activities for training and capacity building for Lithuanian healthcare professionals and administrators. Frame this as a key component of the project's success and long-term impact, even though 'Social Aspects' are marked as 'No'.

Enhances the perceived value and positive impact of the project.
Address Ambiguity with Comprehensive Assumptions
HøyMiddels arbeid

Where tender requirements are vague or missing (e.g., technical capability, financial requirements), clearly state your assumptions and the comprehensive approach you will take to address these aspects. This demonstrates proactivity and a robust understanding of project execution.

Mitigates risks associated with unclear requirements and showcases a thorough approach.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position the bid as the most informed and practical solution for the Lithuanian healthcare system, leveraging unparalleled international experience that is directly transferable and adaptable. Emphasize a partnership approach focused on co-creation and sustainable implementation, rather than a purely advisory role.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

5 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided regarding mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided regarding financial requirements.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

11 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

Pirkimo dokumentaiZIP
PD.7z

This document contains the technical specification for consulting services to develop and test a payment model for healthcare institutions based on achieved results, and a bidder's declaration regarding national security requirements.

Vis
1_Techninė specifikacija (Technical Specification).docxDOC
1_Techninė specifikacija (Technical Specifica... -- 26.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
3_Tiekėjo deklaracija(Supplier’s Declaration).docxDOC
3_Tiekėjo deklaracija(Supplier’s Declaration)... -- 23.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
4_Terminai (Terms).docxDOC
4_Terminai (Terms).docx -- 24.5 KB

No content extracted

Vis
5_Pasiūlymo forma (Proposal Form).docxDOC
5_Pasiūlymo forma (Proposal Form).docx -- 47.5 KB

No content extracted

Vis
6_Eksperto pažymos forma(Expert’s Statement Form).docxDOC
6_Eksperto pažymos forma(Expert’s Statement F... -- 32.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
7.1_Sutarties BS(General Contract Conditions).docxDOC
7.1_Sutarties BS(General Contract Conditions)... -- 77.2 KB

No content extracted

Vis
7.2_Sutarties SS (Special Conditions of the Contract).docxDOC
7.2_Sutarties SS (Special Conditions of the C... -- 41.9 KB

No content extracted

Vis
7.3._Susitarimas dėl duomenų tvarkymo(Data Processing Agreement).docxDOC
7.3._Susitarimas dėl duomenų tvarkymo(Data Pr... -- 30.0 KB

No content extracted

Vis
Pirkimo sąlygos (Procurement Conditions).docxDOC
Pirkimo sąlygos (Procurement Conditions).docx -- 89.7 KB

No content extracted

Vis
2_EBVPD (espd-request).zipZIP
2_EBVPD (espd-request).zip -- 77.4 KB

This document contains a proposal form and expert statement form for tendering international expert consultation services, along with general contract conditions.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for international expert consulting services is generally well-structured but lacks explicit details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its completeness and clarity. While it adheres to EU procurement standards and utilizes e-procurement, further information would enhance its quality.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender appears to comply with general EU procurement directives (2014/24/EU) and utilizes e-procurement. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of reveal dates for submitted proposals is a minor procedural gap. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Missing reveal date for submitted proposals
Klarhet80/100

The description of the procurement object is clear, outlining the need for international expert consulting services for a healthcare payment model project. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, CPV, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The tender documents are available, but their specific content regarding requirements is not fully extracted, leaving some ambiguity.

Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of detailed content extraction from tender documents
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is open and utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies, indicating fairness. However, the undisclosed value and lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Estimated value not disclosed
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks suggests a potential contradiction or missing information regarding the submission process. Financing information is not detailed.

Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission process
Lack of detailed financing information
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active' and there are no noted disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of an active tender.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate these factors.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of procurement object
Adherence to EU procurement directive
E-procurement enabled
Adequate documentation provided

Bekymringer

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Ambiguity in submission process details

Anbefalinger

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for proposals.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide explicit instructions.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline