Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.
Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.
Logg innOppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.
Logg inn14 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier
Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser
3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag
This OCDS Record provides structured data about Sullivan Upper School's restricted tender for on-site catering and hospitality services, with an approximate annual value of £351,000.
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about the Sullivan Upper School's restricted tender for on-site catering services, including the contracting authority's details and the tender's initiation.
This document is a tender notice from Sullivan Upper School for restricted catering services, including hospitality, with an estimated value of £1.755 million over 5-7 years, inviting requests to participate by 2 March 2026.
Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser
This tender exhibits significant data inconsistencies and documentation errors, particularly the inclusion of an irrelevant document and conflicting contract durations, which severely impact its quality and potential for smooth execution.
Legal compliance is significantly hampered by the inconsistent contract duration (36 months vs 5-7 years) and the inclusion of a document pertaining to a completely different tender (King's College Hospital). While CPV codes are correct and no disputes are noted, these fundamental documentation errors pose considerable legal risks and ambiguities.
The tender description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear, and evaluation criteria are specified. However, the fundamental inconsistency regarding the contract duration (36 months in basic info vs 5-7 years in description/requirements) creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders.
While most basic information is present, the tender is incomplete due to the missing 'Liable Person' and the critical issue of Document 1 being irrelevant to this tender. The inconsistent contract duration also points to a lack of thoroughness in defining key terms.
The tender discloses its value and uses objective evaluation criteria (quality/price weighting). However, the absence of electronic submission limits equal access for all potential bidders. The inclusion of an irrelevant document also creates unnecessary confusion, potentially hindering fair participation.
Practicality is low due to the lack of electronic submission, which is a significant barrier in modern procurement. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and highly impractical, suggesting an administrative error.
This category scores very poorly due to multiple critical inconsistencies. Document 1 is for a different entity, the contract duration is stated inconsistently (36 months vs 5-7 years), and the contract start date is illogically set as the submission deadline. Several key fields are also unpopulated.
The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, resulting in a low score for sustainability.
Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser
Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter
Hei! Jeg er din AI-assistent for dette anbudet. Jeg kan hjelpe deg med å forstå krav, frister, kvalifikasjonskriterier og gi strategiske innsikter.
Ingen kredittkort kreves