Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Rammeavtale for juridiske tjenester - 3 lotter

Åpen
Frist
76 dager igjen
juni 30, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Restricted Procedure
Referanse
008043-2026
Verdi
£400,000
Sted
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 08, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

januar 29, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

juni 23, 2026

Frist for innlevering

juni 30, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

juni 30, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£400,000
Varighet
48 måneder
Sted
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Restricted Procedure
49
Kvalitetsscore/100
Middels

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

University of Reading utlyser på nytt sine rammeavtaler for juridiske tjenester. Det vil være 3 lotter som dekker; Lodd 1 – Generelle kommersielle tjenester Lodd 2 – Juridiske tjenester for eiendom og land Lodd 3 – Tjenester for IP-søk, -registrering og -porteføljeforvaltning. Vennligst merk: Fra 1. august 2024 er University of Reading ikke en Kontraktsmyndighet, for formålene av Public Contracts Regulations 2015 eller Public Procurement Directive 2014/24/EU (”Direktivet”), da mindre enn 50 % av vår finansiering kommer fra offentlige kilder.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

11 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-07-01T00:00:00+01:00.
--Bidders must clearly indicate which Lot(s) they are bidding for.
--Bidders must submit a proposal outlining their capabilities for the chosen Lot(s).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to serious professional misconduct, bankruptcy, or other grave offenses that would typically lead to exclusion in a commercial context.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally constituted and authorized to provide legal services in the relevant jurisdiction.
--Bidders must be able to provide legal services relevant to the chosen Lot(s).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must demonstrate expertise and experience in general commercial legal services if bidding for Lot 1.
--Bidders must demonstrate expertise and experience in property and estate legal services if bidding for Lot 2.
--Bidders must demonstrate expertise and experience in IP searching, registration, and portfolio management services if bidding for Lot 3.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability and capacity to undertake a framework agreement with an estimated value of 400,000 EUR over 48 months.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
008043-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record details the University of Reading's retendering of its Legal Services Framework Agreements across three lots: general commercial, property/estate, and IP services, noting that the university is not a public contracting authority under PCR 2015 as of August 1, 2024.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
008043-2026_ocds_release.json

This document is an OCDS data package providing structured information about the University of Reading's retendering of its Legal Services Framework Agreements, covering general commercial, property, and IP services.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
008043-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice from the University of Reading for a Legal Services Framework Agreement, comprising three lots for general commercial, property, and IP services, with an estimated value of £400,000 over four years, noting the University is not a public contracting authority.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

49
Middels

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for legal services by the University of Reading exhibits significant quality issues, primarily due to the complete absence of evaluation criteria and critical data inconsistencies, which undermine transparency and fairness. While the University states it is not a public contracting authority, the process lacks fundamental elements of a well-managed competitive sourcing exercise.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar60/100

The University explicitly states it is not a Contracting Authority under PCR 2015, which reduces the direct applicability of public procurement regulations. However, the process still lacks essential elements for a transparent competitive procedure, such as specified evaluation criteria, consistent deadlines, and complete procedure codes, which are poor practice even for non-regulated tenders.

Missing reveal date (prevents assessment of deadline reasonableness)
No evaluation criteria specified
Klarhet50/100

The description of the framework and its lots, along with the AI-extracted requirements, are clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fullstendighet60/100

While basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration are provided, critical information such as evaluation criteria, a liable person, and specific procedure codes are missing. Furthermore, there are inconsistencies in key dates.

No evaluation criteria specified
Conflicting submission deadlines (basic info vs. AI-extracted)
Rettferdighet40/100

The absence of evaluation criteria is a fundamental flaw that severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the tender process, as bidders cannot understand the basis of assessment. The lack of e-submission also creates barriers to equal access for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
No e-submission support
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet50/100

The lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback, increasing administrative burden for bidders. Additionally, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and impractical, indicating poor planning.

No e-submission support
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Datakonsistens30/100

The tender exhibits significant data inconsistencies, including conflicting submission deadlines between different sections, an illogical contract start date, and a contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the value being disclosed. Several key fields are also unpopulated.

Conflicting submission deadlines (basic info vs. AI-extracted)
Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Bærekraft20/100

The tender makes no mention of any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a complete absence of sustainability considerations in the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of the legal services framework and its lots
Specific CPV code provided
Estimated value and contract duration are disclosed
Basic eligibility and technical requirements are clear

Bekymringer

Complete absence of evaluation criteria
Significant data inconsistencies (deadlines, contract start date)
Lack of electronic submission support
No sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Missing key administrative details (liable person, procedure codes)

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish clear and objective evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
2. Rectify all data inconsistencies, especially regarding submission deadlines and the contract start date.
3. Implement electronic submission to enhance accessibility and efficiency for bidders.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline