Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Boligrenoveringskontrakt for ulike kommunalt eide eiendommer i Ashfield District, Nottinghamshire

Åpen
Frist
1 dager igjen
april 17, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
020527-2026
Verdi
£82,800,000
Sted
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 08, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 06, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 10, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 17, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

juli 12, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£82,800,000
Varighet
36 måneder
Sted
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Ashfield District Council søker å engasjere minst 2 og ikke mer enn 3 entreprenører for å utføre generelle bygningsreparasjoner og vedlikeholdsarbeider på eiendommer i hele Ashfield District, Nottinghamshire. Arbeidskravene er delt inn i 3 geografiske partier: Parti 1 - Hucknall-området Parti 2 - Sutton-området Parti 3 - Kirkby & landlig område

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

5 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
020527-2026_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
020527-2026_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
020527-2026_official.pdf

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for housing refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender follows an open procedure, which is standard. The CPV code is appropriate for construction work. There are no immediate red flags regarding regulatory compliance or disputes based on the provided information. The deadline is present, but its adequacy for a tender of this value and scope is not explicitly assessed here.

Klarhet80/100

The title, organization, and basic description of the work (general building repairs and maintenance) are clear. The division into three geographical lots is also well-defined. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements makes the detailed scope of what is expected from bidders unclear.

No specific requirements listed for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, or submission.
Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date are present. The CPV code and NUTS code are also provided. However, the critical omission of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria significantly detracts from the completeness of the tender documentation.

Missing detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Missing evaluation criteria.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the division into lots allows for potentially broader participation. There are no explicitly tailored requirements for specific companies. The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which can impact transparency.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and a direct URL to tender documents (beyond the count of 5 total) reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission mentioned.
No direct URL to tender documents provided.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) appear logically sequenced. The CPV and NUTS codes are present.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often comes with sustainability requirements. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these important aspects.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria mentioned.

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Substantial estimated value disclosed.
CPV and NUTS codes provided.
Open procedure and geographical lotting.

Bekymringer

Lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Missing evaluation criteria.
No information on e-submission or direct document access.
Absence of sustainability considerations.

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Include information on e-submission and provide direct links to tender documents.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline