Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Rammeavtale for asbestfjerning

Åpen
Frist
12 dager igjen
april 29, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
011500-2026
Verdi
£10,000,000
Sted
Merseyside, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 09, 2026
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

februar 09, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 22, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 29, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

april 30, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£10,000,000
Varighet
48 måneder
Sted
Merseyside
Type
Open Procedure
64
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Vi søker å etablere en rammeavtale for oss av LCRCA og bredere organisasjon for å utføre flere aspekter av asbestarbeid som må fullføres. Rammeavtalen skal deles inn i 3 LOTTER: 1: Asbestfjerning og avhending 2: Asbestinnkapsling 3: Fjerning av asbestmaling og tilhørende tjenester Vi søker for hver av de 3 LOTTER å tildele en rammeavtale med flere leverandører.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

10 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (2)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit bid by 2026-04-29T00:00:00.
--Ability to bid for one or more of the three distinct lots (Asbestos Removal & Disposal, Asbestos Encasement, Asbestos Paint Removal and Associated Services).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None specified in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a supplier capable of participating in a multi-supplier framework.
--Must be able to undertake asbestos works across the specified lots.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Demonstrate expertise in Asbestos Removal & Disposal (for Lot 1).
--Demonstrate expertise in Asbestos Encasement (for Lot 2).
--Demonstrate expertise in Asbestos Paint Removal and Associated Services (for Lot 3).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified in the provided information.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
011500-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about an upcoming framework agreement by Liverpool City Region Combined Authority for asbestos removal, encasement, and paint removal, split into three multi-supplier lots.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
011500-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides structured information about the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority's planned framework tender for asbestos works, including removal, encasement, and paint removal, across three multi-supplier lots.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
011500-2026_official.pdf

The Liverpool City Region Combined Authority is seeking multiple suppliers for a framework agreement to undertake asbestos works (removal, encasement, paint removal, and associated services) across three lots, with an estimated total value of £8-10 million, requiring competence in various environments.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

64
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for asbestos abatement services is well-structured with clear lot divisions and basic information, but suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria, detailed financial requirements, and the lack of electronic submission.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar65/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance concern regarding transparency and equal treatment. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

Missing evaluation criteria
Liable Person not specified
Klarhet75/100

The description of the framework and its three lots is clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are also well-defined. However, the overall clarity for bidders is reduced by the complete absence of evaluation criteria.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Fullstendighet65/100

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. Four documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements ('None specified').

Evaluation criteria not specified
Detailed financial requirements not specified
Rettferdighet55/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements do not appear tailored. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. The lack of e-submission also creates a barrier to equal access.

Evaluation criteria not specified
No e-submission
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet60/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.

No e-submission
Document URL not explicitly provided
Datakonsistens85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor gaps include the empty 'Liable Person' field and 'None specified' for financial requirements.

Liable Person empty
Financial Requirements 'None specified'
Bærekraft20/100

The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not identified as EU funded, which often implies higher sustainability standards.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of framework and lots
Open procedure and CPV code correctly assigned
Estimated value and contract duration clearly specified
No disputes or suspensions

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission
No specified financial requirements
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Liable Person not specified

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish comprehensive evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Implement electronic submission capabilities to enhance accessibility and efficiency.
3. Integrate sustainability, social, and innovation clauses into the tender requirements.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline