Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Anskaffelse av en Utviklingspartner for Varmenett for Liverpool City Centre AZP-området

Åpen
Frist
103 dager igjen
juli 28, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
013229-2026
Verdi
£64,800,000
Sted
Merseyside, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 08, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

februar 13, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

juli 21, 2026

Frist for innlevering

juli 28, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

oktober 27, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£64,800,000
Varighet
12 måneder
Sted
Merseyside
Type
Open Procedure
69
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Liverpool City Council gjennomfører denne anskaffelsen for å velge en Utviklingspartner for å utvikle Liverpool Varmenett og, etter mottak av nødvendige godkjenninger, levere Nettet ved hjelp av Utviklingspartnerens valgte selskapskjøretøy.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

17 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (6)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiell (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submissions must be received by the deadline: 2026-07-28 at 12:00:00 BST (+01:00).
--Submissions will be evaluated against technical, commercial, and social value criteria.
--Bidders must follow the process for expression of interest as per key dates.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The bidder must be a Development Partner.
--The bidder must be capable of developing the Liverpool Heat Network.
--The bidder must be capable of delivering the Liverpool Heat Network.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Demonstrated capability in designing heat networks.
--Demonstrated capability in developing heat networks.
--Demonstrated capability in delivering (constructing) heat networks, specifically district-heating mains construction work (CPV 45232140).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--No specific minimum financial thresholds (e.g., turnover, liquidity) are explicitly stated in the provided information.
--The bidder must demonstrate financial capacity commensurate with a project valued at approximately 64,800,000 EUR / 54,000,000 GBP.
--Proposals will be evaluated based on commercial criteria.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
013229-2026_ocds_record.json

Liverpool City Council is seeking a Development Partner to develop and deliver the Liverpool Heat Network, as detailed in this Open Contracting Data Standard record.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
013229-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides structured information about Liverpool City Council's open procurement to select a Development Partner for the Liverpool Heat Network project's development and delivery.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
013229-2026_official.pdf

Liverpool City Council is seeking a Development Partner to design and deliver the Liverpool Heat Network, with an estimated value of £54,000,000, and submissions are due by July 28, 2026.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

69
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender presents a clear objective for a significant heat network project with ample time for preparation. However, it suffers from a lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, and the absence of electronic submission is a notable drawback.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar85/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns a relevant CPV code. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The submission deadline, when viewed from today's date (2026-02-13), provides ample time for preparation, indicating compliance with reasonable timeframes. However, the specific 'Type Code' and 'Procedure Code' fields are empty, and the reveal date is not provided.

Missing reveal date
Empty 'Type Code' and 'Procedure Code' fields
Klarhet65/100

The overall objective of the procurement is clearly stated. While the AI-extracted requirements are understandable, they lack specific detail regarding mandatory exclusion grounds, minimum financial thresholds, and detailed technical specifications. Although evaluation criteria types (technical, commercial, social value) are mentioned, the specific criteria and their weighting are not provided, which significantly impacts clarity for bidders.

Lack of specific details for mandatory exclusion grounds
Lack of specific financial thresholds
Fullstendighet60/100

The tender includes essential basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and key timelines. All five listed documents are summarized. However, the tender is incomplete regarding the granular details of requirements, particularly the specific evaluation criteria, their weighting, and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds or detailed financial thresholds.

Detailed evaluation criteria (weighting, sub-criteria) are missing
Specific mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed
Rettferdighet65/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. The submission deadline offers a very reasonable timeframe for preparation. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria and their weighting reduces transparency and objectivity. A significant concern for fairness is the lack of electronic submission, which can create barriers to equal access for all potential bidders.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria and weighting
No electronic submission facility
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet60/100

Key practical information such as contract start date and duration is provided. However, the lack of electronic submission is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. While documents are listed, explicit URLs for direct access are not provided in the summary, which could be a minor inconvenience for bidders.

No electronic submission facility
Explicit document URLs are not provided in the summary
Datakonsistens85/100

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code'.

'Liable Person' field is empty
'Type Code' and 'Procedure Code' fields are empty
Bærekraft60/100

The project itself, a heat network, inherently contributes to environmental sustainability. The tender explicitly mentions 'social value criteria' for evaluation, which is a positive inclusion of social aspects. However, there is no explicit focus on broader green procurement criteria or innovation within the requirements, which could enhance the tender's sustainability profile further.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit innovation focus in the requirements

Styrker

Clear overall objective and project description.
Ample time provided for bid preparation (from today's date).
Value disclosed and requirements appear generic, promoting fair competition.
Inclusion of social value criteria in evaluation.
Good data consistency with logical dates and no disputes.

Bekymringer

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria and weighting.
Absence of electronic submission facility.
High-level and non-specific requirements for eligibility, financial thresholds, and mandatory exclusion grounds.
Missing explicit green procurement criteria and innovation focus.
Empty fields for 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code'.

Anbefalinger

1. Provide comprehensive and detailed evaluation criteria, including weighting, to enhance transparency and objectivity.
2. Implement an electronic submission system to improve accessibility, efficiency, and fairness for all bidders.
3. Detail specific mandatory exclusion grounds, minimum financial thresholds, and more granular technical requirements to ensure clarity and completeness.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline