Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

NYTT ANBUD St Marys Grensemur

Åpen
Frist
7 dager igjen
april 24, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
026486-2026
Verdi
£612,000
Sted
East Anglia, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 10, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 23, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 17, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 24, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

juni 05, 2026

KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
£612,000
Varighet
4 måneder
Sted
East Anglia
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

East Suffolk Council søker en entreprenør for fornyelse og reparasjon av en del av St Marys kirkegårds sørlige grensemur i Woodbridge, inkludert nye støttepilarer og porter for kjøretøy. Dette er et nytt anbud med endringer i dokumentasjonen.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

15 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (6)
Finansiell (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit their tender by the deadline: 2026-04-24T12:00:00+01:00.
--Bidders must adhere to all instructions and requirements outlined in the tender documents.
--Bidders must ensure all required documentation is submitted in the correct format.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by relevant procurement legislation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered and authorized to operate in the relevant jurisdiction.
--Bidders must demonstrate they have the necessary legal and regulatory compliance.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must have proven experience in renewal and repair of boundary walls, including the construction of new buttresses.
--Bidders must have experience in removing existing and constructing new vehicular entrance gate piers and connecting boundary walls.
--Bidders must have experience in re-hanging adapted salvaged gates.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability and capacity to undertake a contract of this value (612,000 EUR).
--Bidders may be required to provide financial statements or other evidence of financial standing.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
026486-2026_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
026486-2026_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
026486-2026_official.pdf

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for boundary wall renewal and repair is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is a key component of legal compliance in tender processes.

Missing evaluation criteria
Klarhet80/100

The description of the works is detailed and specific, outlining the scope of renewal, repair, and construction. The AI-extracted requirements further clarify technical and financial expectations. The re-tender nature and emphasis on reviewing updated documentation also contribute to clarity, although it necessitates careful bidder attention.

Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of content or summaries for the tender documents is a significant gap, hindering a full assessment of completeness. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria also impacts completeness.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is an open competition, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the process is described as open. The technical requirements are specific to the scope of work and do not appear to be tailored to a single company. The main concern for fairness is the lack of transparency regarding how bids will be evaluated.

No evaluation criteria specified
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and a direct URL to the tender documents reduces practicality. While financing is implied by the estimated value, explicit details are missing. The submission deadline, while present, is noted as potentially short.

No e-submission specified
No direct URL to tender documents
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced. The CPV code is present and relevant.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria within this procurement process.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Styrker

Clear and detailed description of works
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Open competition procedure
Relevant CPV code provided

Bekymringer

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content/summaries available
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Potential for a short submission deadline

Anbefalinger

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Provide direct links or accessible summaries of all tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline