Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Dyluniad Manwl Seilwaith Gwyrdd a Glas / Detaljert design av grønn og blå infrastruktur

Åpen
Frist
1 dager igjen
april 17, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Referanse
023958-2026
Verdi
£258,000
Sted
West Wales and The Valleys, Storbritannia
Publisert
april 08, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 17, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 10, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 17, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

juni 21, 2026

Budsjett
£258,000
Varighet
10 måneder
Sted
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Mae'r Cyngor yn edrych i benodi ymgynghorwyr cymwys a phrofiadol i gynhyrchu Dyluniad Manwl Seilwaith Gwyrdd a Glas ar gyfer oddeutu 10km o dirwedd strydoedd. ******************************************************************************************************************************** Rådet søker å engasjere en passende kvalifisert og erfaren konsulent for å produsere et detaljert design for grønn og blå infrastruktur for omtrent 10 km med gatebildedesign.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er ikke tilgjengelig for dette landets anbud ennå. Støttes for øyeblikket: Estland, Latvia, Litauen, Polen, Frankrike, Storbritannia, Danmark, Nederland, Norge og Finland.

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

7 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Consultants must be suitably qualified.
--Consultants must be experienced.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to produce a Green & Blue Infrastructure Detailed Design.
--Experience in designing for approximately 10km of streetscape.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

3 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

OCDS RecordDOC
023958-2026_ocds_record.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
OCDS Release PackageDOC
023958-2026_ocds_release.json

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Official PDF VersionPDF
023958-2026_official.pdf

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Green & Blue Infrastructure Detailed Design is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and the deadline might be tight.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, and CPV code. The procedure is open, which is standard. The absence of specified disputes and a clear regulatory compliance section is noted, but not a critical issue given the information provided. The deadline is a potential concern for legal compliance if it's deemed too short for a comprehensive response.

Deadline may be too short
Klarhet80/100

The title and description are clear, outlining the scope of work for Green & Blue Infrastructure Detailed Design for approximately 10km of streetscape. The extracted requirements for qualification and experience are understandable. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific submission requirements detailed
Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The contract start date is also provided. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of detailed submission requirements mean that crucial information for bidders is missing.

No document content available
No specific submission requirements detailed
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility (qualified and experienced consultants) are objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria.

Missing evaluation criteria
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of detailed submission requirements make the practical aspects of bidding less straightforward. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission specified
No specific submission requirements detailed
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced. The data appears consistent within the provided information.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title and description of scope
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure for broad participation
Objective eligibility criteria (qualified and experienced)

Bekymringer

Missing detailed evaluation criteria
Lack of specific submission requirements
No explicit mention of sustainability or innovation
Potential for a short submission deadline

Anbefalinger

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Provide clear instructions and requirements for bid submission, including format and method (e-submission if applicable).

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline