Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Gjenopprettende vedlikehold av dekket på riksvei 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla km 175 - 191,4 og reparasjon av Metsküla parkeringsplassvei fra 1990

Åpen
Frist
6 dager igjen
april 21, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Bygg og anlegg
Referanse
307648
Verdi
€1,978,000
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
mars 24, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Cost of rehabilitation of the pavement of State Road 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla km 175 - 191.4 and repair of the Metsküla parking lot road in 1990100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 24, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 14, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 21, 2026

Anbudsåpning

april 20, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€1,978,000
Varighet
4 måneder
Sted
Estonia
Type
Bygg og anlegg
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€524,963
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
4.7
Konkurranse
Medium
SMB-vinnere
94%
5,932 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Gjenopprettende vedlikehold av dekket på riksvei 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla km 175 - 191,4 og reparasjon av Metsküla parkeringsplassvei fra 1990 i henhold til vilkårene i anbudsdokumentene.
Grønn anskaffelseElektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

65%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender focuses solely on cost, making a highly competitive price the primary driver of success. Bidders must meticulously detail their cost breakdown, demonstrating efficiency and value. While social and innovative aspects are absent, a strong emphasis on technical capability and adherence to green procurement principles will be crucial for differentiation.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the most cost-effective solution for high-quality road rehabilitation.

Efficient Execution: A proven ability to complete complex roadworks within tight deadlines.

Sustainable Infrastructure: Commitment to environmentally responsible construction practices.

Sentrale muligheter
Leveraging economies of scale and efficient project management to offer a highly competitive price.
Demonstrating a clear understanding of the technical specifications (HD III Tehniline kirjeldus) to build confidence in execution capability.
Highlighting any existing sustainable practices or materials that align with the 'Green Procurement: Yes' requirement, even if not explicitly detailed in the AI-extracted requirements.
Sentrale utfordringer
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost-based evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and ensure the cost breakdown is meticulously detailed and justifiable to avoid any perception of underbidding without a clear rationale.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or material price fluctuations impacting the submitted cost.

Include a reasonable contingency within the general costs, clearly explain the assumptions made in the cost breakdown, and ensure robust supply chain management.

The absence of specific social or innovative aspects in the tender may limit differentiation beyond price and technical execution.

Focus on excelling in the defined criteria: cost, technical capability, and green procurement. Ensure the cost breakdown is flawless and the technical proposal is robust.

Ideell leverandørprofil
An experienced road construction company with a proven track record in similar rehabilitation projects, possessing strong cost management capabilities and a commitment to sustainable practices. They should be adept at detailed cost breakdown preparation and capable of delivering the project within the specified four-month timeframe.
Sentrale krav
Submission of a completed cost breakdown in Excel, including detailed costs for execution of works, general costs, and site preparation.
Confirmation of agreement with tender conditions and completion of the electronic tender pass (ESPD).
Explanation of business secrets.
Compliance with green procurement requirements.
Demonstrated technical capability for road construction works.
Viktigste differensiatorer
A meticulously detailed and transparent cost breakdown that clearly articulates cost efficiencies and value for money.
Demonstrated experience in similar-scale road rehabilitation projects with a focus on efficient project delivery.
Proactive integration of green procurement principles beyond minimum requirements, showcasing a genuine commitment to sustainability.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
While social aspects are not explicitly requested, consider including a statement on commitment to local employment or responsible waste management within the general costs or as an addendum, framing it as a natural extension of efficient and responsible project execution.
Fokusområder for anbud
Cost of rehabilitation of the pavement of State Road 4 Tallinn - Pärnu - Ikla km 175 - 191.4 and repair of the Metsküla parking lot road in 1990100.0%

Develop a highly competitive and well-justified cost breakdown. Ensure all costs (execution, general, site preparation) are detailed and reflect efficient operations. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness while maintaining profitability. The lowest bid price receives maximum points, so aggressive pricing is key.

Anbefalinger5
Master the Cost Breakdown
KritiskMye arbeid

Dedicate significant resources to preparing the Excel cost breakdown. Ensure it is detailed, transparent, and defensible. Every line item should be justifiable and reflect efficient operational practices. Benchmark against industry standards and recent similar projects to ensure competitiveness.

Directly impacts the primary evaluation criterion, maximizing the chance of winning.
Flawless Tender Pass and Condition Confirmation
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Ensure the electronic tender pass (ESPD) is completed accurately and all mandatory confirmations of agreement with tender conditions are provided. Any errors here can lead to immediate disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Proactive Green Procurement Integration
HøyMiddels arbeid

Even though not heavily detailed, actively integrate and highlight sustainable practices in the bid. This could include using recycled materials where appropriate, efficient waste management plans, or low-emission equipment. Document these in the technical proposal or cost breakdown's general costs.

Provides a competitive edge beyond price and demonstrates alignment with the contracting authority's stated green procurement objective.
Thorough Risk Assessment for Costing
HøyMiddels arbeid

Conduct a comprehensive risk assessment for potential cost overruns, including material price fluctuations, unforeseen ground conditions, and labor availability. Build appropriate contingencies into the general costs and clearly state any assumptions made.

Protects profitability and avoids issues during contract execution.
Clarify Business Secrets Explanation
MediumLite arbeid

Prepare a clear and concise explanation of any business secrets that need to be disclosed. Ensure it meets the tender's requirements without compromising sensitive information.

Fulfills a mandatory requirement and avoids potential issues.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on quality or adherence to green procurement. Emphasize efficiency in project delivery and a clear understanding of the technical requirements. Highlight any specific expertise in road rehabilitation that translates to cost savings and timely completion.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

21 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (11)
Obligatorisk (2)
Overholdelse (4)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiell (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must explain business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must explain business secrets.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must explain business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender is for road construction works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender value is 1978000.0 EUR.
--The contract duration is 4 months.
--The cost breakdown must include detailed costs for the execution of works, including general costs and costs for the preparation of the construction site.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

9 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307648_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on preventing fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking.

Vis
VastavustingimusedPDF
307648_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm agreement with tender conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and explain any business secrets to ensure a compliant bid.

Vis
HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 25.5 KB

The contracting authority requests the submission of a cost breakdown, detailing expenses for carrying out the works, including general costs and site preparation costs.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307648_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The tender contract cost is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest bid price receives the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307648_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 76.3 KB

The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions, but it is filled out electronically.

Vis
HD II Hankelepingu projektZIP
HD II Hankelepingu projekt.zip -- 955.5 KB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
HD III Tehniline kirjeldusZIP
HD III Tehniline kirjeldus.zip -- 3.0 MB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
HD I VormidZIP
HD I Vormid.zip -- 43.6 KB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.4 KB

This document outlines the general terms of the procurement procedure, exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements, presented within an electronic tender process.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for road repair works is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and clearer guidance on certain submission formats.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure type 'E' and 'A' are standard. The 'Status: 11' likely indicates an active procurement phase.

Klarhet80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The evaluation criteria are specified as 'relative_weighting' with the contract cost being the sole criterion, which is understandable for this type of work.

Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the reliance on attached documents for crucial details like 'Riigihanke alusdokument' and the unanalyzable formats for some documents (ESPD, HD I, HD III, HD IV) reduce completeness. The justification for not dividing into parts is mentioned but not detailed in the provided text.

Some essential documents are in unanalyzable formats (.xml, .zip), hindering full assessment.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The value is disclosed, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are positive. However, the mention of unanalyzable file formats for key documents (ESPD, HD I, HD III, HD IV) poses a practical challenge for bidders relying solely on the provided text. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.

Some critical documents are in formats not directly analyzable by AI, potentially impacting bidder preparation.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender validity period aligns with the submission and opening dates.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is positive. However, there is no further detail on specific social aspects or innovation focus within the provided text. It is also not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific details on green procurement, social aspects, and innovation.

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization details.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are utilized.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration.
Mention of Green Procurement.

Bekymringer

Some critical documents are in unanalyzable formats (.xml, .zip).
Limited detail on sustainability aspects beyond the mention of 'Green Procurement'.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Anbefalinger

1. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in accessible formats for bidders.
2. Elaborate on the specific green procurement, social, and innovation requirements.
3. Clearly state the contract start date.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Ny tjeneste

Ønsker du at vi håndterer denne anbudskonkurransen?

Våre innkjøpseksperter forbereder alt. Du gjennomgår, godkjenner og sender inn.

~1hDin tid
80%+80 %+
$0På forhånd
Se full sammenligning
Uten TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid
15-25 %
Gjennomsnittlig vinnerate
80 %+
Vinnerprosent
Risiko for feil
Manuell gjennomgang
Ekspert QA
Samsvarskontroll
Du gjør alt
Håndterer alt
Vi gjør alt
Heldekkende tjeneste
La oss vinne dette anbudet
Betal kun når du vinner · 400+ selskaper stoler på oss
Eller gjør det selv

Legg til i pipeline