Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Bygge- og renoveringsarbeid for Saku kommunes institusjoner 2026

Lukket
Frist
0 dager igjen
april 15, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Bygg og anlegg
Referanse
307555
Verdi
€150,100
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
mars 19, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Total cost of works100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 19, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 08, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 15, 2026

Anbudsåpning

april 15, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

mai 31, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€150,100
Varighet
Ikke spesifisert
Sted
Estonia
Type
Bygg og anlegg
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€524,963
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
4.7
Konkurranse
Medium
SMB-vinnere
94%
5,932 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Gjennomføring av bygge- og renoveringsarbeider i bygningene til Saku kommunes institusjoner: 1. Barnehage Päikesekild, Saku Teaduse 14 2. Barnehage Terake, Saku Tallinna mnt 12, Pargi 27, Juubelitammede tee 6 3. Kajamaa skole, Saku Kooli tee 1 4. Kurtna skole, Kurtna bygd Kurtna tee 50 5. Saku redningssentral, Saku Päästekeskuse tee 1 6. Kiisa fritidssenter, Kiisa Kurtna tee 8 7. Saku dagsenter, Saku Juubelitammede tee 6 8. Offentlige lekeplasser i Saku kommune 9. Saku musikkskole, Saku Tallinna mnt 10 10. Saku videregående skole grunnskole, Saku Tallinna mnt 10 11. Saku helsesenter, Saku Tiigi 19 12. Saku ungdomssenter, Saku Uus Saku 3a
Elektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

65%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender prioritizes price above all else, making aggressive cost management and a highly competitive bid essential. While social value and innovation are not explicitly weighted, demonstrating efficiency and reliability through past performance and a clear execution plan will be crucial for securing this contract.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Unbeatable Value: Delivering high-quality construction and renovation services at the most competitive price.

Reliable Execution: Ensuring timely and efficient project completion across all Saku Municipality facilities.

Transparent Partnership: Proactive communication and clear documentation throughout the project lifecycle.

Sentrale muligheter
Dominance in price evaluation due to 100% weighting.
Potential to leverage existing relationships or local presence in Saku Municipality.
Opportunity to showcase efficiency and streamlined processes through the detailed cost breakdown.
Sentrale utfordringer
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize material sourcing, and explore efficient construction methodologies to offer the lowest possible price without compromising quality.

Managing multiple, diverse sites with varying renovation needs.

Develop a detailed project management plan that accounts for the specific requirements of each facility, ensuring efficient resource allocation and scheduling.

Potential for unforeseen issues during site inspections or renovations.

Include contingency planning in the cost breakdown and project schedule. Ensure clear communication channels with the contracting authority for prompt issue resolution.

Ideell leverandørprofil
A construction and renovation company with a proven track record in public sector projects, particularly educational and community facilities. The ideal bidder possesses strong cost control capabilities, efficient project management, and a robust supply chain to ensure competitive pricing. Experience with multiple, geographically dispersed sites is also beneficial.
Sentrale krav
Detailed cost breakdown and quantity table (Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx)
Confirmation of compliance with qualification requirements via Hankepass
Familiarization with the object
Electronic submission by the deadline
Subcontractor background checks and explanations
Viktigste differensiatorer
Demonstrably the lowest price, achieved through optimized processes and supply chain management.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that instills confidence in value for money.
A clear and concise project execution plan that highlights efficiency and minimal disruption to facility operations.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities as a value-add, even if not directly scored. This can be framed as a commitment to the Saku community.
Fokusområder for anbud
Total cost of works100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest price possible by meticulously detailing all costs, optimizing resource allocation, and leveraging bulk purchasing power. Ensure the cost breakdown is clear, justifiable, and directly addresses the scope of works for each listed facility.

Anbefalinger6
Aggressively Price for the Lowest Bid
KritiskMye arbeid

Given the 100% weighting on total cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible price. This requires meticulous cost analysis, efficient procurement, and optimized labor planning. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising essential quality standards.

Directly maximizes score in the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Master the Cost Breakdown (Vorm 1)
KritiskMye arbeid

The 'Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx' is paramount. It must be exceptionally detailed, accurate, and transparent, clearly itemizing costs for each object. Ensure it aligns perfectly with the technical specifications and demonstrates a deep understanding of the scope.

Crucial for meeting technical requirements and demonstrating competence, directly influencing price perception.
Conduct Thorough Site Familiarization
HøyMiddels arbeid

The requirement to familiarize oneself with the objects is explicit. Undertake detailed site visits to all listed facilities to accurately assess existing conditions, identify potential challenges, and refine cost estimates. Document these visits.

Reduces risk of underestimation, improves bid accuracy, and demonstrates commitment.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
MediumLite arbeid

While not explicitly scored, subtly emphasize your company's ability to execute projects efficiently and with minimal disruption to the daily operations of educational and community facilities. This can be woven into the technical description or project execution plan.

Builds confidence in the contracting authority regarding project continuity and reliability.
Proactive Subcontractor Vetting
HøyMiddels arbeid

The contracting authority will vet subcontractors. Ensure all subcontractors are pre-vetted by your company for criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking. Have all necessary documentation and explanations ready to submit.

Prevents disqualification due to subcontractor issues and demonstrates responsible procurement practices.
Ensure Flawless Electronic Submission
KritiskLite arbeid

Adhere strictly to all electronic submission requirements and the deadline. Double-check all uploaded documents for completeness and correct formatting to avoid any last-minute technical issues.

Ensures the bid is formally accepted and considered.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on the essential quality and reliability required for public facilities. Emphasize a streamlined, efficient approach to project delivery that translates directly into savings for the municipality.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

12 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (6)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (2)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--The bid must include information on the terms of the contract, technical description, and grounds for bid rejection.
--The bid must specify the cost of the works.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general exclusion grounds may apply based on the ESPD and other documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must confirm compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements via the Hankepass (electronic confirmation).
--Joint bidders require a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must provide a cost breakdown and quantity table (Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx) detailing the cost of construction and renovation works, including specific object descriptions like Lasteaed Päikesekild.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors for criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the works will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

8 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307555_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal offenses, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

Vis
VastavustingimusedPDF
307555_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.2 KB

The tender document clarifies requirements for joint bidder authorization, declaration of trade secrets, bid submission conditions, cost presentation, and site visit confirmation.

Vis
Vorm 1 kululoend ja mahutabel.XLS
Vorm 1 - kululoend ja mahutabel 2026.xlsx -- 53.0 KB

The bidder must submit a cost breakdown and quantity table detailing the costs of construction and renovation works for Saku Municipality's sub-institutions, including descriptions of work for specific sites like Päikesekild Kindergarten.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307555_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates bids based on the total cost of works, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307555_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, but it is filled out electronically.

Vis
Hankelepingu projektPDF
Hankelepingu projekt.pdf -- 164.2 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms and conditions for construction and renovation works, specifying the objects, payment, and deadlines for works at Saku Municipality's subordinate institutions.

Vis
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.pdf -- 275.0 KB

This document is a proposal for submitting a bid, outlining the tender procedure's conditions, formatting, and submission, along with information on contract terms, technical specifications, and bid rejection.

Vis
Tehnilise kirjelduse lisadZIP
Tehn_kirjeldus_ lisad.zip -- 35.7 MB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for construction and renovation works at Saku Municipality's subordinate institutions is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of submission could be improved.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance standards, including proper CPV code and clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is clearly stated as attached to the tender documents.

Klarhet80/100

The description of works is clear, listing all specific locations. Requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting based on total cost. Conditions for bid submission and subcontractor checks are outlined.

Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, the specific duration of the contract is not explicitly stated, only the tender validity period. The financing condition is linked to attached documents, which is acceptable but could be more directly stated.

Contract duration not explicitly stated.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, with full document access implied. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are objective (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is linked to attached documents. However, the specific duration of the contract is missing, impacting full practicality.

Contract duration not explicitly stated.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).

Styrker

Clear description of works and locations
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Disclosure of estimated value

Bekymringer

Contract duration not explicitly stated
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Some document formats not AI-analyzable (e.g., .zip)

Anbefalinger

1. Explicitly state the contract duration.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation or requirements.
3. Ensure all relevant documents are in AI-analyzable formats where possible.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Ny tjeneste

Ønsker du at vi håndterer denne anbudskonkurransen?

Våre innkjøpseksperter forbereder alt. Du gjennomgår, godkjenner og sender inn.

~1hDin tid
80%+80 %+
$0På forhånd
Se full sammenligning
Uten TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid
15-25 %
Gjennomsnittlig vinnerate
80 %+
Vinnerprosent
Risiko for feil
Manuell gjennomgang
Ekspert QA
Samsvarskontroll
Du gjør alt
Håndterer alt
Vi gjør alt
Heldekkende tjeneste
La oss vinne dette anbudet
Betal kun når du vinner · 400+ selskaper stoler på oss
Eller gjør det selv

Legg til i pipeline