Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Riksvei nr. 17 Keila-Haapsalu vei km 6,55-6,8 likvidering av trafikkfarlig sted ved Lehola bussholdeplasser og km 13,59-14,3 bygging av kryss og gangforbindelser

Lukket
Frist
0 dager igjen
april 15, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Bygg og anlegg
Referanse
307292
Verdi
€417,000
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
mars 11, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Cost of liquidation of dangerous location of Lehola bus stops on state road No. 17 Keila-Haapsalu road km 6.55-6.8 and construction of road crossings and footpath connections on km 13.59-14.3100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

mars 11, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

april 08, 2026

Frist for innlevering

april 15, 2026

Anbudsåpning

april 07, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€417,000
Varighet
5 måneder
Sted
Estonia
Type
Bygg og anlegg
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€524,963
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
4.7
Konkurranse
Medium
SMB-vinnere
94%
5,932 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Riksvei nr. 17 Keila-Haapsalu vei km 6,55-6,8 likvidering av trafikkfarlig sted ved Lehola bussholdeplasser og km 13,59-14,3 bygging av kryss og gangforbindelser i henhold til vilkårene fastsatt i offentlige anskaffelsesdokumenter.
Grønn anskaffelseElektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

65%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender is heavily weighted towards cost (100%), making aggressive pricing a primary driver for success. While technical capability is implied, the focus on cost necessitates a lean, efficient execution strategy. Leveraging experience in similar road infrastructure projects and demonstrating cost-effectiveness through a detailed breakdown will be crucial.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Cost-Effective and Efficient Road Infrastructure Solutions

Proven Expertise in Road Safety and Accessibility Improvements

Reliable Delivery within Budget and Timeline

Sentrale muligheter
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost weighting.
Demonstrate efficiency in project execution to justify competitive pricing.
Leverage experience in similar road safety and pedestrian access projects.
Utilize the 'Green Procurement' aspect to highlight sustainable practices, even if not explicitly weighted.
Sentrale utfordringer
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct a thorough cost analysis to identify all cost drivers and potential areas for efficiency. Explore bulk purchasing, optimized logistics, and lean construction methodologies. Consider a slightly lower profit margin if market analysis indicates it's necessary to win.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or scope creep, impacting cost and timeline.

Conduct a detailed site visit and risk assessment. Include contingency in the cost breakdown for minor unforeseen issues. Clearly define the scope of work in the bid to avoid ambiguity.

Ensuring all mandatory requirements and submission formats are met precisely.

Dedicate a team member to meticulously review all tender documents and ensure strict adherence to all instructions, especially regarding the Excel cost breakdown and ESPD. Conduct internal reviews before submission.

Ideell leverandørprofil
A road construction company with a proven track record in executing similar infrastructure projects (road improvements, pedestrian access, bus stop modifications) within budget and on schedule. The ideal bidder will have strong cost control mechanisms, efficient supply chain management, and a clear understanding of Estonian road construction standards and regulations.
Sentrale krav
Acceptance of tender conditions
Completed cost breakdown in Excel
Confirmation of no mandatory exclusion grounds
Subcontractor due diligence (fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing)
Technical capability to execute road construction and pedestrian connection works
Viktigste differensiatorer
Demonstrated cost savings through innovative construction methods or material sourcing.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that clearly articulates value for money.
Evidence of successful completion of similar, complex road safety and pedestrian integration projects on time and within budget.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
Commit to employing local labor where feasible, particularly for less skilled roles, to support the local economy. This can be a subtle differentiator even if not explicitly scored.
Fokusområder for anbud
Cost of liquidation of dangerous location of Lehola bus stops on state road No. 17 Keila-Haapsalu road km 6.55-6.8 and construction of road crossings and footpath connections on km 13.59-14.3100.0%

Develop a highly competitive and aggressive pricing strategy. Ensure the cost breakdown is meticulously prepared, transparent, and optimized for efficiency. Benchmark against historical project costs and market rates to ensure competitiveness while maintaining a viable profit margin. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or safety.

Anbefalinger5
Aggressive Costing Strategy
KritiskMye arbeid

Given the 100% cost weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. Conduct a thorough cost analysis, identify all cost-saving opportunities, and consider a lean profit margin. Ensure the Excel cost breakdown is detailed, accurate, and clearly demonstrates value.

Directly impacts the bid's scoring and likelihood of winning.
Meticulous Document Compliance
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Ensure absolute adherence to all submission requirements, especially the Excel cost breakdown format and the ESPD (Hankepass). Any errors or omissions in mandatory documents can lead to disqualification. Allocate sufficient resources for document review and quality assurance.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Highlight Project Efficiency and Experience
HøyMiddels arbeid

While cost is paramount, subtly highlight past successful projects of similar scope (road safety, pedestrian access) and demonstrate efficient project management capabilities. This builds confidence in the ability to deliver on time and within the aggressive budget.

Builds trust and reinforces the credibility of the low bid.
Thorough Site Assessment and Risk Identification
HøyMiddels arbeid

Conduct a detailed site visit to identify potential risks (e.g., existing infrastructure, ground conditions, traffic management complexities). Incorporate reasonable contingencies into the cost breakdown for minor unforeseen issues, but avoid over-inflating the price.

Minimizes the risk of cost overruns and project delays.
Local Employment Commitment
LavLite arbeid

Include a statement about prioritizing local labor for specific roles. While not a scored criterion, it aligns with broader public procurement goals and can be a positive subtle differentiator.

Minor positive perception, potential for community goodwill.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on essential safety and quality standards. Emphasize efficiency and proven execution capabilities to justify the competitive price.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

15 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (5)
Obligatorisk (4)
Overholdelse (4)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must describe business secrets if applicable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS4
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must describe business secrets if applicable.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must describe business secrets if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in provided summaries, but implied by the nature of road construction work.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

8 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307292_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 30.0 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

Vis
VastavustingimusedPDF
307292_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.9 KB

Bidders must confirm agreement with tender conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and describe any business secrets if applicable.

Vis
HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 29.7 KB

This document contains a cost breakdown for construction site preparation and general costs, essential for bid preparation.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307292_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The tender evaluates bid costs, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307292_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.9 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Vis
HD II Hankelepingu projektZIP
HD II Hankelepingu projekt.zip -- 911.3 KB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
HD I VormidZIP
HD I Vormid.zip -- 43.6 KB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.4 KB

The tender's foundational document outlines the procurement procedure, qualification requirements, and grounds for bidder exclusion, all presented within the electronic procurement system.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for road construction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit details on technical capabilities and sustainability aspects.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear process. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The use of the electronic procurement system is a positive indicator.

Klarhet80/100

The description of the works is specific, and the requirements for bidders, such as the cost breakdown and subcontractor checks, are clearly stated. The evaluation criteria, focusing on cost, are also explicitly mentioned.

Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI analysis indicates that technical capability requirements are not explicitly detailed, and some important documents are in formats not supported for analysis, potentially hiding crucial information.

Technical capability requirements not explicitly detailed.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is conducted via an e-procurement platform, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation is based on objective criteria (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is provided, but the lack of a start date can impact planning.

Contract start date not specified.
Financing information absent.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and deadlines are populated logically. The dates provided are consistent and do not indicate any immediate issues. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step. However, there is no explicit detail on social aspects or innovation within the provided summaries. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of detailed social aspects and innovation criteria.

Styrker

Clear description of works and specific requirements.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed estimated value.

Bekymringer

Technical capability requirements are not explicitly detailed.
Contract start date and financing information are missing.
Limited information on social and innovation aspects of sustainability.

Anbefalinger

1. Provide explicit details on technical capability requirements.
2. Specify the contract start date and relevant financing information.
3. Elaborate on the social and innovation aspects of the 'Green Procurement' characteristic.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Ny tjeneste

Ønsker du at vi håndterer denne anbudskonkurransen?

Våre innkjøpseksperter forbereder alt. Du gjennomgår, godkjenner og sender inn.

~1hDin tid
80%+80 %+
$0På forhånd
Se full sammenligning
Uten TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid
15-25 %
Gjennomsnittlig vinnerate
80 %+
Vinnerprosent
Risiko for feil
Manuell gjennomgang
Ekspert QA
Samsvarskontroll
Du gjør alt
Håndterer alt
Vi gjør alt
Heldekkende tjeneste
La oss vinne dette anbudet
Betal kun når du vinner · 400+ selskaper stoler på oss
Eller gjør det selv

Legg til i pipeline