Trenger du hjelp fra en anbudsekspert? Se vår anbudsforberedelsestjeneste
Anbud

Preparation of the main project for Märjamaa waste station

Lukket

Fristen for innlevering er utløpt

Fristen for innlevering av dette anbudet er utløpt og aksepterer ikke lenger søknader. Informasjonen nedenfor beholdes for referanseformål.

Se aktive anbud
Frist
Utløpt
7. april 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Tjenester
Referanse
306980
Verdi
€45,000
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
26. mars 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Total bid price100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

26. mars 2026

Frist for spørsmål

31. mars 2026

Frist for innlevering

7. april 2026

Anbudsåpning

6. april 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€45,000
Varighet
6 måneder
Sted
Estonia
Type
Tjenester
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€71,415
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
4.8
Konkurranse
Medium
SMB-vinnere
99%
2,006 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

The aim of the procurement is to find a designer for the construction of a waste station in Märjamaa municipality, Orgita village, on the land owned by the Waste Centre (KÜ 50301:001:0170).
EU-finansiertElektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

60%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender is a price-driven opportunity focused on the preparation of a main project for a waste station. Success hinges on a highly competitive bid price, supported by demonstrable experience in similar projects and qualified personnel. While social value and innovation are not explicit criteria, demonstrating efficiency and a clear understanding of the technical requirements will be crucial.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

The most cost-effective and technically sound solution for Märjamaa's waste station project.

Proven expertise in delivering essential infrastructure projects on time and within budget.

Sentrale muligheter
Sole reliance on price for evaluation offers a clear path to winning for a low-cost provider.
The defined scope (studies, approvals, permits, supervision) allows for precise cost estimation and resource allocation.
The relatively low estimated value suggests a project manageable by smaller, agile firms who can offer competitive pricing.
Sentrale utfordringer
Intense price competition due to the 100% price evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore efficient project delivery methodologies and leverage existing templates or software for faster design processes. Consider partnerships for specific tasks if it reduces overall cost.

Demonstrating sufficient prior experience in 'main projects' if the bidder's portfolio is diverse.

Clearly highlight and quantify relevant past projects that align with the scope of a waste station's main project. Emphasize the complexity and scale of these projects, even if they were not explicitly for waste management facilities, as long as they involved similar design and approval processes.

Ideell leverandørprofil
A small to medium-sized architectural or engineering firm with a proven track record in designing waste management facilities or similar industrial infrastructure projects. They must possess a lean operational structure allowing for a highly competitive pricing strategy, coupled with a team of experienced engineers and architects capable of delivering the full scope of services efficiently.
Sentrale krav
Previous experience in preparing main projects.
Appropriately qualified key personnel.
Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
Total bid price (100% evaluation criterion).
Studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision.
Viktigste differensiatorer
A highly optimized and lean project delivery methodology that translates directly into a lower bid price.
A clear demonstration of efficiency and speed in obtaining necessary permits and approvals based on past experience.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment during the author's supervision phase or the use of local suppliers for any minor on-site support, if feasible and cost-neutral.
Fokusområder for anbud
Total bid price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all mandatory requirements are met. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin. Leverage any economies of scale or pre-existing design elements.

Anbefalinger6
Aggressively Price the Bid
KritiskMye arbeid

Given the 100% weight on price, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid that is still profitable and meets all requirements. Conduct a detailed cost analysis to identify all areas for optimization.

Directly determines the winning score.
Prove Relevant Project Experience
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Clearly articulate and provide evidence of previous experience in preparing 'main projects', especially those involving industrial facilities, infrastructure, or complex permitting processes. Quantify the scope and complexity of these past projects.

Meets eligibility criteria and builds confidence in capability.
Highlight Qualified Key Personnel
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Present CVs and qualifications of key personnel that demonstrate their expertise in architectural design, engineering, and navigating approval processes for similar projects. Emphasize their experience relevant to waste management infrastructure if possible.

Meets eligibility criteria and demonstrates technical competence.
Thoroughly Address Exclusion Grounds
HøyLite arbeid

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously reviewed and confirmed as absent. Provide clear and unambiguous confirmations as required by the tender documents.

Prevents disqualification.
Clarify Trade Secret Explanations
HøyLite arbeid

Prepare clear and concise explanations regarding any trade secrets, ensuring they do not hinder the evaluation of the bid or reveal proprietary information unnecessarily.

Meets submission requirements and avoids potential issues.
Optimize Submission Format and Cost Structure
MediumLite arbeid

Adhere strictly to the specified submission format and cost structure. Any deviation could lead to disqualification or a less favorable evaluation.

Ensures compliance and proper evaluation.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position the bid as the most efficient and cost-effective solution by highlighting streamlined processes and experienced personnel capable of delivering the project with minimal overhead. Emphasize a 'no-frills' approach that directly benefits the contracting authority through significant cost savings.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

9 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (4)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (1)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide explanations regarding trade secrets.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of the terms.
--Bidders must agree to the submission format and cost structure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must have previous experience in preparing main projects.
--Bidders must have appropriately qualified key personnel.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The project includes studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision during construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

5 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

VastavustingimusedPDF
306980_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.5 KB

The bidder must provide explanations regarding trade secrets, confirm acceptance of terms, agree to the submission format and cost structure, and provide proof of equivalence if necessary.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306980_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The total bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives maximum points.

Vis
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306980_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds, demonstrate prior experience in preparing main project designs, and possess qualified key personnel.

Vis
Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (Jäätmejaama põhip... -- 41.2 KB

The contracting authority seeks a designer to prepare the main project for the Märjamaa waste station, including studies, approvals, permit applications, and author supervision during construction.

Vis
hankelepingu olulised tingimusedDOC
Lisa 2 Töövõtulepingu projekt (Jäätmejaama põ... -- 35.3 KB

The essential terms of the procurement contract outline the object of the contract for the preparation of the main project and author's supervision for the Märjamaa waste station, the obligations of the parties, and the integral parts of the contract.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

75
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for the design of a waste station in Märjamaa is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of all tender documents.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible.

Klarhet80/100

The description of the objective is clear, and the requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, and technical capabilities are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated.

Fullstendighet70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the status '11' is unclear without context, and the availability of all 5 documents is implied but not explicitly confirmed as fully accessible or attached in a way that guarantees immediate download for all potential bidders.

•Status code '11' requires clarification.
Rettferdighet85/100

The tender is fair, with the value disclosed and objective criteria (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The requirements for previous experience and qualified personnel are standard and not overly tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract duration is specified. However, information regarding financing is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not provided, which can impact planning for bidders.

•Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
•Contract start date is not provided.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Bærekraft50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which is a positive aspect. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or requirements.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Styrker

Clear objective and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Bekymringer

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing contract start date and detailed financing information.
Ambiguity of status code '11'.

Anbefalinger

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., waste management practices, use of sustainable materials) into the technical requirements or evaluation.
2. Provide the expected contract start date and more detailed information on financing sources.
3. Clarify the meaning of the status code '11' for better transparency.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter