Hulp van een aanbestedingsexpert nodig? Bekijk onze dienst voor aanbestedingsvoorbereiding
Aanbestedingen

Preparation of the main project for Märjamaa waste station

Gesloten

Deadline voor indiening verstreken

De deadline voor het indienen van deze aanbesteding is verstreken en er worden geen aanvragen meer geaccepteerd. De onderstaande informatie wordt ter referentie bewaard.

Bekijk actieve aanbestedingen
Deadline
Verlopen
7 april 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Diensten
Referentie
306980
Waarde
€45,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
26 maart 2026
CPV-code
Beoordelingscriteria
Total bid price100%
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

26 maart 2026

Deadline voor vragen

31 maart 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

7 april 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

6 april 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€45,000
Looptijd
6 maanden
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Diensten
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€71,415
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.8
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
99%
2,006 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

The aim of the procurement is to find a designer for the construction of a waste station in Märjamaa municipality, Orgita village, on the land owned by the Waste Centre (KÜ 50301:001:0170).
EU-gefinancierdElektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

AI-gestuurde analyse van de vereisten, kansen en uitdagingen van deze aanbesteding. Krijg strategische inzichten om je winstkans te maximaliseren.

60%
Geschatte winstkansMatige match

This tender is a price-driven opportunity focused on the preparation of a main project for a waste station. Success hinges on a highly competitive bid price, supported by demonstrable experience in similar projects and qualified personnel. While social value and innovation are not explicit criteria, demonstrating efficiency and a clear understanding of the technical requirements will be crucial.

Kernboodschappen voor winst

The most cost-effective and technically sound solution for Märjamaa's waste station project.

Proven expertise in delivering essential infrastructure projects on time and within budget.

Belangrijke Kansen
Sole reliance on price for evaluation offers a clear path to winning for a low-cost provider.
The defined scope (studies, approvals, permits, supervision) allows for precise cost estimation and resource allocation.
The relatively low estimated value suggests a project manageable by smaller, agile firms who can offer competitive pricing.
Belangrijke Uitdagingen
Intense price competition due to the 100% price evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore efficient project delivery methodologies and leverage existing templates or software for faster design processes. Consider partnerships for specific tasks if it reduces overall cost.

Demonstrating sufficient prior experience in 'main projects' if the bidder's portfolio is diverse.

Clearly highlight and quantify relevant past projects that align with the scope of a waste station's main project. Emphasize the complexity and scale of these projects, even if they were not explicitly for waste management facilities, as long as they involved similar design and approval processes.

Ideaal Inschrijversprofiel
A small to medium-sized architectural or engineering firm with a proven track record in designing waste management facilities or similar industrial infrastructure projects. They must possess a lean operational structure allowing for a highly competitive pricing strategy, coupled with a team of experienced engineers and architects capable of delivering the full scope of services efficiently.
Belangrijkste Vereisten
Previous experience in preparing main projects.
Appropriately qualified key personnel.
Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
Total bid price (100% evaluation criterion).
Studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision.
Belangrijkste onderscheidende factoren
A highly optimized and lean project delivery methodology that translates directly into a lower bid price.
A clear demonstration of efficiency and speed in obtaining necessary permits and approvals based on past experience.
Kansen voor sociale waarde
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment during the author's supervision phase or the use of local suppliers for any minor on-site support, if feasible and cost-neutral.
Focusgebieden voor de inschrijving
Total bid price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price while ensuring all mandatory requirements are met. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource planning, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin. Leverage any economies of scale or pre-existing design elements.

Aanbevelingen6
Aggressively Price the Bid
KritiekHoge inspanning

Given the 100% weight on price, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid that is still profitable and meets all requirements. Conduct a detailed cost analysis to identify all areas for optimization.

Directly determines the winning score.
Prove Relevant Project Experience
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Clearly articulate and provide evidence of previous experience in preparing 'main projects', especially those involving industrial facilities, infrastructure, or complex permitting processes. Quantify the scope and complexity of these past projects.

Meets eligibility criteria and builds confidence in capability.
Highlight Qualified Key Personnel
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Present CVs and qualifications of key personnel that demonstrate their expertise in architectural design, engineering, and navigating approval processes for similar projects. Emphasize their experience relevant to waste management infrastructure if possible.

Meets eligibility criteria and demonstrates technical competence.
Thoroughly Address Exclusion Grounds
HoogLage inspanning

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously reviewed and confirmed as absent. Provide clear and unambiguous confirmations as required by the tender documents.

Prevents disqualification.
Clarify Trade Secret Explanations
HoogLage inspanning

Prepare clear and concise explanations regarding any trade secrets, ensuring they do not hinder the evaluation of the bid or reveal proprietary information unnecessarily.

Meets submission requirements and avoids potential issues.
Optimize Submission Format and Cost Structure
GemiddeldLage inspanning

Adhere strictly to the specified submission format and cost structure. Any deviation could lead to disqualification or a less favorable evaluation.

Ensures compliance and proper evaluation.
Concurrentiepositie
Position the bid as the most efficient and cost-effective solution by highlighting streamlined processes and experienced personnel capable of delivering the project with minimal overhead. Emphasize a 'no-frills' approach that directly benefits the contracting authority through significant cost savings.

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

9 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (4)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (2)
Technisch (1)
Financieel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide explanations regarding trade secrets.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of the terms.
--Bidders must agree to the submission format and cost structure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must have previous experience in preparing main projects.
--Bidders must have appropriately qualified key personnel.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The project includes studies, approvals, permit applications, and author's supervision during construction.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

5 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

VastavustingimusedPDF
306980_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.5 KB

The bidder must provide explanations regarding trade secrets, confirm acceptance of terms, agree to the submission format and cost structure, and provide proof of equivalence if necessary.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306980_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The total bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives maximum points.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306980_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds, demonstrate prior experience in preparing main project designs, and possess qualified key personnel.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (Jäätmejaama põhip... -- 41.2 KB

The contracting authority seeks a designer to prepare the main project for the Märjamaa waste station, including studies, approvals, permit applications, and author supervision during construction.

hankelepingu olulised tingimusedDOC
Lisa 2 Töövõtulepingu projekt (Jäätmejaama põ... -- 35.3 KB

The essential terms of the procurement contract outline the object of the contract for the preparation of the main project and author's supervision for the Märjamaa waste station, the obligations of the parties, and the integral parts of the contract.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for the design of a waste station in Märjamaa is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of all tender documents.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the objective is clear, and the requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, and technical capabilities are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated.

Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the status '11' is unclear without context, and the availability of all 5 documents is implied but not explicitly confirmed as fully accessible or attached in a way that guarantees immediate download for all potential bidders.

•Status code '11' requires clarification.
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is fair, with the value disclosed and objective criteria (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The requirements for previous experience and qualified personnel are standard and not overly tailored to specific companies.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract duration is specified. However, information regarding financing is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not provided, which can impact planning for bidders.

•Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
•Contract start date is not provided.
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which is a positive aspect. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or requirements.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Sterke punten

Clear objective and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Aandachtspunten

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Missing contract start date and detailed financing information.
Ambiguity of status code '11'.

Aanbevelingen

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., waste management practices, use of sustainable materials) into the technical requirements or evaluation.
2. Provide the expected contract start date and more detailed information on financing sources.
3. Clarify the meaning of the status code '11' for better transparency.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten