Manned guarding service

This tender for manned guarding services demonstrates high quality in its documentation, clarity, and fairness, with comprehensive requirements and transparent evaluation criteria. While strong in most aspects, it notably lacks any focus on sustainability or innovation.

The tender exhibits strong legal compliance, clearly defining the procedure type and utilizing appropriate CPV codes. The inclusion of the 'or equivalent' clause and adherence to national procurement law (RHS) with ESPD usage indicates alignment with EU/national regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are detected.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-documented and categorized, with AI-extracted requirements being comprehensive. Evaluation criteria, based solely on the lowest price, are explicitly stated, ensuring transparency.

All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and location, is fully provided. The tender includes a comprehensive set of documents, such as an ESPD guide, conditions, evaluation criteria, draft contract, and technical specifications, ensuring all necessary details are available.

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full document access, disclosed estimated value, and reasonable deadlines. The evaluation criteria are objective and transparent, based solely on the lowest price. E-procurement is enabled, and the 'or equivalent' clause prevents requirements from being tailored to specific companies.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are fully supported, enhancing practicality. Contract duration is clearly specified, and financing information is referenced within the draft contract. The absence of an explicit direct URL for all documents is a minor practical inconvenience, though implied by the e-procurement system.

All key fields are populated, and the data is highly consistent across the tender. There are no detected suspensions or disputes, and all dates are logical and sequential.

The tender completely lacks any focus on sustainability, including green procurement, social criteria, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.