Hulp van een aanbestedingsexpert nodig? Bekijk onze dienst voor aanbestedingsvoorbereiding
Aanbestedingen

Põltsamaa linnuse kompleksi konvendihoone avatäited

Gesloten

Deadline voor indiening verstreken

De deadline voor het indienen van deze aanbesteding is verstreken en er worden geen aanvragen meer geaccepteerd. De onderstaande informatie wordt ter referentie bewaard.

Bekijk actieve aanbestedingen
Deadline
Verlopen
20 januari 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Bouw
Referentie
304540
Waarde
€330,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
5 januari 2026
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

5 januari 2026

Deadline voor vragen

13 januari 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

20 januari 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

20 januari 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€330,000
Looptijd
14 maanden
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Bouw
79
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€524,963
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.7
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
94%
5,932 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Hanke mahus on konvendihoone välisperimeetri ja sisehoovi avatäidete paigaldamine koos kaasnevate töödega vastavalt hanke tehnilisele kirjeldusele ja selle lisaks olevatele projektidele. Lisaks tuleb konvendihoone katuse räästas lindude sissepääsuks sulgeda raabitsvõrguga. Ehitustööde kestus 12 kuud lepingu sõlmimisest. Riigihange viiakse läbi kahes etapis, millest: I etapp on taotluste esitamine ning Taotlejate kvalifitseerimine ning II etapp pakkumuste esitamine ja vajadusel Pakkujatega läbirääkimiste pidamine. NB! RHS § 81 lg 1 lähtuvalt võib hankija muuta hanketeadet või muid riigihanke alusdokumente konkurentsipõhises läbirääkimistega hankemenetluses ENNE TAOTLUSTE ESITAMISE tähtpäeva. Hanke alusdokumente muuta võivad päringud palume küsida I etapis. II etapis ei tohi hankija enam alusdokumente muuta ning hankega tuleks sel juhul alustada algusest. Tehnilised detailid saab üle täpsustada läbirääkimiste käigus, kuhu I etapis kutsutakse kõik vastavaks tunnistatud pakkujad.
EU-gefinancierdElektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

2 vereisten over 1 categorieën

Verplicht (2)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must meet the exclusion grounds outlined in the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document).
--The main contractor must provide information about subcontractors regarding criminal offenses, and subcontractors must not have grounds for exclusion.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

9 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304540_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

This document describes the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance stage, including questions regarding criminal offenses that the main contractor must provide about subcontractors.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304540_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines general tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, declaration of business secrets, subcontractor engagement, and confirmation of tender compliance with basic documents and cost structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304540_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the cost of restoration works for the convent building's openings, accounting for 100% of the score, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304540_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.1 KB

This document is an explanatory ESPD outlining the qualification conditions and exclusion grounds for the restoration of infills in the Põltsamaa castle complex convent building, which bidders must complete electronically.

Lisa 1.2. Arc Projekt OÜ põhiprojektSIG
2052_PP_AR_Arhitektuur.asice -- 46.8 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Lisa 1.1. Avatäidete projekt_DWGZIP
DWG (2) (1).zip -- 2.9 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Lisa 1.1._pdf_PÕLTSAMAA LINNUSE KONVENDIHOONE AKENDE TAASTAMISE PROJEKTZIP
Konvendihoone avatäited_PDF.zip -- 5.3 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus _.pdf -- 194.2 KB

This technical description details the scope of installation and associated construction works for the Põltsamaa Castle convent building's openings, including material procurement, installation, required project documents, legal acts, standards, and a 36-month warranty period.

Juhised pakkujale, sh lepinguprojektPDF
Põltsamaa linnuse kompleksi konvendihoone ava... -- 318.5 KB

This document provides instructions for participating in the competitive negotiation procurement for the restoration of openings in the Põltsamaa castle complex convent building, outlining the two-stage process and requirements for workforce and materials.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

79
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for the Põltsamaa Castle complex convent building openings restoration is well-structured, utilizing a two-stage competitive negotiation procedure. It demonstrates good legal compliance, transparency, and provides comprehensive documentation, though some project files were not analyzable and there's a minor inconsistency in contract duration.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving85/100

The tender appears compliant with EU/national procurement regulations, utilizing ESPD and referencing relevant sections of the Public Procurement Act. The competitive negotiation procedure is clearly defined in the description, and the 'or equivalent' clause for standards is a good practice. Deadlines are reasonable.

•The 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: G' with N/A codes are not standard and could be confusing without the descriptive text.
Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of works, evaluation criteria (100% cost), and requirements are generally clear and well-documented across various tender documents. The two-stage process is clearly outlined.

•A minor inconsistency exists between the stated contract duration (14 months) and the duration mentioned in the description (12 months).
•The content of some critical project files (.DWG, .asice) could not be analyzed, limiting a full assessment of their clarity.
Volledigheid75/100

All basic information, financial details, timelines, and classification data are provided. Comprehensive documentation, including technical specifications, project files, and a contract draft, is attached.

•The content of some critical project files (.DWG, .asice) could not be analyzed, preventing a full assessment of their completeness.
•Minor inconsistency in contract duration (14 months vs 12 months).
Eerlijkheid90/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness with full value disclosure, reasonable deadlines for preparation, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (100% cost). The 'or equivalent' clause for standards and the justification for not dividing the tender into parts further enhance fairness. E-procurement is enabled.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid70/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. Financing information is indicated as available within the documents, and the duration is specified.

•The exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, though it's implied to be upon contract signing.
•No direct document URL was provided in the basic information, though documents are listed as attached.
Gegevensconsistentie85/100

Most key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent across the timeline.

•A minor inconsistency exists between the stated contract duration (14 months) and the duration mentioned in the description (12 months).
Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender is explicitly EU-funded, which generally implies adherence to higher governance and transparency standards. However, it lacks specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the scope of the works themselves.

•No specific green procurement criteria.
•No specific social criteria.

Sterke punten

Clear two-stage competitive negotiation procedure.
Comprehensive documentation, including technical specifications and contract draft.
Explicit 'or equivalent' clause for standards, promoting fair competition.
EU-funded, indicating adherence to higher procurement standards.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.

Aandachtspunten

Minor inconsistency in stated contract duration (14 months vs 12 months).
Some critical project files (.DWG, .asice) were not analyzable by AI, limiting full content assessment.
Lack of specific green, social, or innovation criteria within the tender requirements.
The 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: G' with N/A codes are not standard and could be confusing without the descriptive text.

Aanbevelingen

1. Clarify and harmonize the contract duration specified in the basic information and the description.
2. Ensure all critical project documents are provided in universally accessible and analyzable formats, or provide summaries for non-standard formats.
3. Consider incorporating relevant sustainability criteria (e.g., use of local, sustainable materials for restoration, waste management plan) where appropriate for future tenders.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten