Levering van diensten voor radononderzoek in diverse gemeentelijke eigendommen 2026-2029

This tender for radon gas testing services is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall completeness and clarity.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of services is clear, outlining the need for testing, advice, remedial works, and maintenance. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, and duration is present. The main issue is the lack of accessible document content, preventing a full assessment of requirements and attached documents.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is noted. Criteria are objective in nature (technical capability), but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be a concern for bidders.

E-procurement is indicated, but the absence of a direct document URL and the lack of explicit financing information or contract start date reduce practicality. The duration is specified.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logical within the context of the tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.