Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Carisbrooke Primary Fase 3 Dak, Technische Ruimte en Branddeuren

Open
Deadline
7 dagen resterend
April 24, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Open Procedure
Referentie
012472-2026
Waarde
£360,000
Locatie
Hampshire and Isle of Wight, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 09, 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Februari 11, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 17, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 24, 2026

Startdatum contract

Juli 26, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
£360,000
Looptijd
2 maanden
Locatie
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Type
Open Procedure
64
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Het voltooien van de dakrenovatie door het vervangen van de resterende secties, het voltooien van de werkzaamheden in de technische ruimte na vervanging van de ketel en de vernieuwing van branddeuren

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

7 vereisten over 2 categorieën

Indiening (1)
Technisch (6)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-04-24T00:00:00.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Ability to perform construction work as per CPV Category 45000000.
--Capability to complete roof upgrades by replacing the remaining sections.
--Capability to complete plant room works following boiler replacement.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
012472-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about a planned tender by the Isle of Wight Council for roof upgrades, plant room works, and fire door renewals, including a link to the official planned procurement notice on Find a Tender.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012472-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides machine-readable information about a planned procurement notice from the Isle of Wight Council for roof upgrades, boiler room works, and fire door renewals.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012472-2026_official.pdf

This is a planned procurement notice from Isle of Wight Council for a construction project to upgrade roofs, plant rooms, and fire doors, with an estimated value of £300,000 and a tender submission deadline of April 24, 2026.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

64
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender exhibits good foundational information and transparency regarding value and timelines, but is significantly hampered by the critical absence of evaluation criteria and lack of electronic submission, impacting clarity and fairness.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined and appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, which is a minor transparency gap, and some codes (Type, Procedure) are not populated. The submission deadline is reasonable from today's date.

Missing reveal date
Missing Type/Procedure codes
Duidelijkheid60/100

The project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Volledigheid65/100

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and key deadlines are provided. The tender documents are also listed. The primary deficiency is the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, which is a fundamental component of a complete tender package.

Missing evaluation criteria
"Liable Person" field empty
Eerlijkheid60/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the technical requirements appear generic, not tailored. The submission deadline provides reasonable time for preparation. However, the absence of evaluation criteria creates a significant transparency issue, potentially undermining fair competition. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access and efficiency.

Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Document access is implied through OCDS data. The main practical drawback is the explicit lack of electronic submission, which can increase administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

No e-submission
Gegevensconsistentie80/100

The tender generally exhibits good data consistency with no reported disputes or suspensions, and logical dates. Most key fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include a slight difference in the submission deadline timestamp between the timeline and AI-extracted requirements, and some empty code fields.

Minor date timestamp inconsistency
Empty "Liable Person" and Type/Procedure codes
Duurzaamheid20/100

The tender documentation does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Sterke punten

Clear project description and technical requirements
Transparent disclosure of estimated value and key timelines
Use of OCDS data for machine-readable information
Reasonable submission deadline from today's date

Aandachtspunten

Critical absence of evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission option
No explicit mention of sustainability (green, social, innovation) aspects
Missing reveal date and some unpopulated fields

Aanbevelingen

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fair competition.
2. Implement electronic submission to enhance accessibility, efficiency, and reduce administrative burden.
3. Integrate sustainability considerations by exploring opportunities for green, social, or innovation clauses.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline