Beheer van een 5-tegen-5 voetbalcompetitie

This tender for small-sided football league management is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation, impacting its completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for an open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially tight, is specified.

The description of the service required is clear and concise. The eligibility and technical capability requirements are understandable, although the absence of specific evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Most essential information is present, including title, organization, value, and deadlines. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce the overall completeness of the tender package.

The tender is open to all bidders, and the value is disclosed. The requirements are objective and focused on the service itself, with no apparent tailoring to specific companies. The use of an open competition procedure promotes fairness.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit e-submission instructions and the absence of document content make the submission process less practical for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.