Naamkaartjes (via smart form)

This tender for name badges is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for a below-threshold procurement. No disputes are reported. The procedure is an open competition, which is standard.

The title and description are clear regarding the subject matter (name badges). However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements leaves room for ambiguity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and start date. However, the lack of specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) and the absence of document content significantly reduce its completeness.

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of detailed criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but the open nature mitigates this.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission and a clear document URL for accessing tender documents hinders practical application for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, resulting in a moderate score.