Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Aanschaf van foto- en videoapparatuur

Open
Deadline
19 dagen resterend
Mei 05, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Leveringen
Referentie
168786
Waarde
€41,999
Locatie
Riga, Letland
Gepubliceerd
Maart 24, 2026
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 24, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 28, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

Mei 05, 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

Mei 05, 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€41,999
Looptijd
24 maanden
Locatie
Riga
Type
Leveringen
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€94,756
Gem. Inschrijvingen
2.1
Concurrentie
Laag
MKB-winnaars
96%
1,002 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Aanschaf van foto- en videoapparatuur

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

AI-gestuurde analyse van de vereisten, kansen en uitdagingen van deze aanbesteding. Krijg strategische inzichten om je winstkans te maximaliseren.

65%
Geschatte winstkansMatige match

This tender for photo and video equipment by Rīga Stradiņš University presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating strong technical capability, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of the university's needs, despite the lack of explicit evaluation criteria. Proactive engagement and a well-structured offer are crucial.

Kernboodschappen voor winst

Reliable and High-Quality Photo/Video Equipment Solutions Tailored for Academic Needs.

Cost-Effective Procurement with Flexible Contractual Terms.

Belangrijke Kansen
Lack of specified evaluation criteria suggests a potential for a more holistic evaluation, where strong technical proposals and competitive pricing can carry significant weight.
The possibility of a contract extension (12 months) offers an opportunity to build a long-term relationship with the university, provided the initial contract is fulfilled successfully.
The estimated value (41999.0) is moderate, suggesting that a broad range of suppliers can compete, but a highly competitive price will be a key differentiator.
The tender is for 'supplies', indicating a focus on the tangible equipment rather than complex service integration, simplifying the offering.
Belangrijke Uitdagingen
The absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid to maximize scoring. Bidders must infer the most important factors.

Thoroughly analyze the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikums ar līgumu' to identify implicit priorities. Focus on demonstrating superior technical specifications, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of the university's likely needs for photo and video equipment in an academic setting. Offer clear, concise, and well-organized documentation.

High competition is likely due to the straightforward nature of the procurement and the lack of specific technical complexity, potentially driving down margins.

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. Highlight any unique selling propositions, such as extended warranties, bundled accessories, or superior after-sales support, that can add value without significantly increasing costs. Emphasize reliability and long-term value.

The tender documents are in Latvian, requiring accurate translation and understanding of all nuances, especially concerning legal and technical terms.

Engage professional translation services for all tender documents. Have legal and technical experts review the translated documents to ensure full comprehension and compliance.

Ideaal Inschrijversprofiel
An established supplier of professional photo and video equipment with a proven track record of supplying to public institutions or educational bodies. The ideal bidder will possess strong technical expertise, competitive pricing, and the ability to offer flexible contract terms, potentially including extended warranty or support services.
Belangrijkste Vereisten
Submission of offers by the deadline: 2026-05-05T09:00:00
Adherence to submission forms, eligibility criteria, and evaluation methods detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Meeting eligibility requirements (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Demonstrating technical capability (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Meeting financial requirements (details in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Understanding and accepting the contract terms outlined in 'Nolikums ar līgumu', including the potential for a 12-month extension without exceeding the contract sum.
Belangrijkste onderscheidende factoren
Demonstrable experience in supplying photo and video equipment to educational institutions, with case studies or references.
A highly competitive price point combined with value-added services (e.g., extended warranty, training, rapid support).
A clear understanding of Rīga Stradiņš University's potential use cases for the equipment (e.g., academic lectures, research, marketing, student projects) and tailoring the offer accordingly.
A robust and well-presented technical proposal that clearly outlines the specifications and benefits of the proposed equipment.
Kansen voor sociale waarde
While 'Social Aspects: No' is indicated, consider a subtle mention of supporting local employment or sustainable packaging practices if feasible and not overly burdensome, as this can sometimes be viewed favorably even when not explicitly required.
Focusgebieden voor de inschrijving
Technical Capability

Provide detailed specifications for all proposed equipment, ensuring they meet or exceed any implied requirements. Include datasheets and highlight key features relevant to an academic environment. Offer a range of options if permitted, demonstrating flexibility.

Price

Conduct thorough market research to establish a competitive price. Consider offering tiered pricing or discounts for bulk purchases. Clearly outline all costs, including delivery and any potential installation or setup services.

Contractual Terms

Demonstrate a clear understanding of the contract duration and the extension clause. Offer terms that align with the university's potential needs for flexibility and long-term value. Highlight reliability and commitment to the contract.

Aanbevelingen7
Thorough Document Review and Translation
KritiekHoge inspanning

Ensure all tender documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Nolikums ar līgumu') are meticulously reviewed and accurately translated from Latvian to English (and back to Latvian for submission if required). Pay close attention to technical specifications, legal clauses, and submission guidelines.

Ensures full compliance, avoids disqualification, and allows for strategic bid development.
Infer and Prioritize Evaluation Factors
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, infer likely priorities based on the tender type (supplies), the contracting authority (university), and the contract duration. Focus on demonstrating technical superiority, competitive pricing, and reliability. Structure the bid to clearly address these inferred priorities.

Maximizes the perceived value of the bid, even without explicit weighting.
Offer Value-Added Services
HoogGemiddelde inspanning

Propose competitive pricing for the equipment and differentiate by offering value-added services such as extended warranties, on-site support, basic training on equipment usage, or bundled accessories that enhance the usability for an academic environment.

Increases perceived value and sets the bid apart from purely price-driven competitors.
Develop a Detailed Technical Proposal
HoogGemiddelde inspanning

Provide comprehensive technical specifications for all proposed photo and video equipment. Include manufacturer datasheets and highlight how the equipment meets the likely needs of a university (e.g., lecture recording, research, media production).

Demonstrates technical competence and understanding of the client's needs.
Clarify Contract Extension Clause
HoogLage inspanning

Ensure a clear understanding of the contract extension clause: 'If the contract sum is not utilized within 24 months... the parties may consider extending the contract term by 12 months, without exceeding the contract sum.' Structure pricing and delivery to align with this potential flexibility.

Avoids contractual misunderstandings and demonstrates foresight.
Proactive Engagement (if permitted)
GemiddeldLage inspanning

If the tender rules allow for clarification questions, proactively seek clarification on any ambiguous points, particularly regarding the implied evaluation criteria or specific equipment needs.

Provides crucial insights and demonstrates engagement.
Highlight Sustainable Practices (Subtly)
LaagLage inspanning

If possible without significant cost or effort, mention any sustainable packaging or waste reduction initiatives in the bid submission. This can be a positive, albeit non-mandatory, consideration.

May offer a slight edge in perception.
Concurrentiepositie
Position the bid as offering the best balance of quality, reliability, and competitive pricing for academic photo and video equipment. Emphasize long-term value and a commitment to supporting the university's educational and research objectives. Highlight any experience with similar public sector or educational clients.

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

6 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (2)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (1)
Technisch (1)
Financieel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Offers must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-05-05T09:00:00
--Submission forms, eligibility criteria, and evaluation methods are detailed in the document "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the summary]

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

2 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168786_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324052632.pdf -- 100.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the purchase of photo and video equipment by Rīga Stradiņš University, detailing submission forms, eligibility criteria, and evaluation methods.

Nolikums ar līgumuDOC
5_pielikums_LIGUMA PROJEKTS_55_2026.docx -- 38.3 KB

This document contains a purchase agreement for the acquisition of photo and video equipment by Rīga Stradiņš University, detailing the subject matter, payment terms, and delivery procedures.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for photo and video equipment is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes are reported. The procedure is open, which is standard. The main area for improvement is ensuring full regulatory compliance regarding document accessibility.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key information like estimated value, deadlines, and contract duration are specified. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the summary makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their offers will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, estimated value, and deadlines. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section is notably sparse, indicating that crucial details regarding mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are likely contained within the attached documents, which are not fully accessible or summarized here.

Limited summary of mandatory/eligibility/technical/financial requirements
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is an open procedure and uses e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue is a significant concern, as it may prevent potential bidders from accessing all necessary information to prepare a competitive offer, potentially limiting fairness. The lack of specified evaluation criteria also impacts objective assessment.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

The tender is active and has a clear submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests that the submission process might not be fully electronic, which could reduce practicality. Information regarding financing is not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.

No e-submission (implied)
Missing financing information
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced. The tender is active and has a valid period.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Sterke punten

Clear basic information and title
Reasonable submission deadline
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Open procedure and e-procurement

Aandachtspunten

Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Limited summary of detailed requirements
Lack of sustainability focus

Aanbevelingen

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria within the tender notice or accessible documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline