Herstel van 4 steenriffen in Lillebælt

This tender for the re-establishment of stone reefs in Lillebælt is generally well-structured with clear objectives and technical requirements. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements beyond a nominal value, and the sustainability aspects are not explicitly defined.

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the scope. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the project's purpose and the technical requirements for stone material procurement, delivery, and placement are clear. The timeline for execution is also specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria hinders full clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, CPV code, and submission deadline are present. The estimated value is stated, though it appears to be a placeholder. The description provides substantial detail on the project's scope and technical needs. However, crucial documents like the 'Special Work Description' are referenced but not directly accessible or summarized, and contract duration is not explicitly stated beyond the execution period.

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The technical requirements are objective and related to the scope of work. The value is disclosed, albeit with a placeholder. Access to tender documents is provided through external links and attachments, promoting transparency. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. A submission deadline and contract start/end dates (execution period) are provided. However, the financing information is not detailed, and the contract duration is not explicitly defined as a separate field. The availability of document content is limited.

Key fields like title, organization, CPV, and deadline are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, execution period) are logical and do not indicate suspension or disputes. The estimated value of 1.00 EUR is inconsistent with the project scope, suggesting a placeholder.

The tender focuses on ecological restoration, which has inherent environmental benefits. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text, limiting the score in this category.