Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.
Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.
InloggenUpgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.
Inloggen9 vereisten over 5 categorieën
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen
Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.
Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.
Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.
Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken
This tender for the refurbishment and extension of Doon Academy is generally well-structured, with clear project scope and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure type. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is not fully assessed without knowing the full scope of required documentation. No disputes are noted.
The description of the project, including the scope of refurbishment, extension, and demolition, is clear. The requirements for Design and Build capability and specific technical experience (refurbishment, demolition, asbestos handling) are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria introduces some ambiguity.
Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and CPV code. The contract duration is stated as anticipated but will be confirmed at ITT, which is a minor omission. The primary concern is the lack of accessible content for the tender documents.
The tender is open to any capable bidder, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on technical capability. The use of a restricted procedure is noted. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.
The tender specifies e-procurement as a characteristic, but the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and requires clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is anticipated but not confirmed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The status is 'active', and no disputes are reported. Dates are logical, with the submission deadline well into the future from the date of the tender notice.
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten
Hallo! Ik ben je AI-assistent voor deze aanbesteding. Ik kan je helpen bij het begrijpen van vereisten, deadlines, geschiktheidscriteria en strategische inzichten bieden.
Geen creditcard vereist