Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.
Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.
InloggenUpgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.
Inloggen12 vereisten over 5 categorieën
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen
This tender seeks UK-based, UKAS ISO 17025 accredited laboratories compliant with NATO AEP-2920 to provide ballistic testing services for personal armour over a 5-year contract with optional extensions, valued up to £10m.
This tender seeks UK-based, UKAS ISO 17025 accredited and NATO AEP-2920 compliant laboratories to provide ballistic testing services for personal armour over a 5-year contract with a £10m headroom.
This tender seeks UK-based laboratories accredited to ISO 17025 by UKAS and compliant with NATO AEP-2920 to provide ballistic testing services for personal armour to the UK Armed Forces, with a contract value up to £10m over 5+3 years.
Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken
This tender provides a clear description of the required ballistic testing services but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and practical implementation, alongside several data inconsistencies.
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and no disputes are reported. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds is a minor concern. The UK facility requirement, while restrictive, is likely justifiable for defence procurement under national regulations.
The service description and technical requirements are very clear and well-documented. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant deficiency that severely impacts the clarity of the selection process for potential bidders.
Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are present. However, the 'Liable Person' is missing, and there are inconsistencies in contract duration. Crucially, while requirements are listed, the essential evaluation criteria are absent, and the 'Required: No' status for all listed documents is confusing, potentially indicating missing submission templates.
The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern for fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their proposals will be judged. The absence of e-submission also creates an unequal playing field. The mandatory UK facility requirement, while potentially justifiable for national security, significantly limits competition.
The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is highly impractical and likely an error, indicating a flawed timeline.
Several inconsistencies are present: the estimated value is listed as EUR in basic info but £10m in the description, the contract duration (58 months) conflicts with the described 5 years + 3x1 optional years, and the contract start date is illogically set to the submission deadline. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus criteria. This is common for defence procurement but results in a low score for this category.
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten
Hallo! Ik ben je AI-assistent voor deze aanbesteding. Ik kan je helpen bij het begrijpen van vereisten, deadlines, geschiktheidscriteria en strategische inzichten bieden.
Geen creditcard vereist