Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.
Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.
InloggenUpgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.
Inloggen14 vereisten over 5 categorieën
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen
Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.
Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.
Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.
Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken
This tender for the Tate Britain Garden Classroom Build Contractor is generally well-structured, with clear project descriptions and technical requirements. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and transparency.
The tender adheres to basic legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and no apparent disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, though the submission deadline is relatively short. The procedure is an open competition below threshold, which is a standard legal route.
The project description is clear and detailed, outlining the purpose, scope, and context of the garden classroom. Technical requirements are well-documented, and the form of contract is specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content limits the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders. The contract start date is also very close to the submission deadline.
The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for technical capability are objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.
The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, and the estimated value is clear. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of accessible tender documents hinder practicality for bidders. The short submission deadline also impacts practicality.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the contract start date following the submission deadline.
The tender mentions the aspiration for inclusive, inspiring, and sustainable spaces, and the garden classroom's design includes rainwater collection, which are positive aspects. However, there are no explicit requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, and it is not indicated as EU funded.
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten
Hallo! Ik ben je AI-assistent voor deze aanbesteding. Ik kan je helpen bij het begrijpen van vereisten, deadlines, geschiktheidscriteria en strategische inzichten bieden.
Geen creditcard vereist