Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Econometrisch Model voor de Industrie

Open
Deadline
11 dagen resterend
April 27, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Open Procedure
Referentie
006204-2026
Waarde
£9,600,000
Locatie
Inner London - West, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 08, 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Januari 23, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 20, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 27, 2026

Startdatum contract

Oktober 04, 2026

Budget
£9,600,000
Looptijd
48 maanden
Locatie
Inner London - West
Type
Open Procedure
59
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Redelijk

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) zoekt een partner om een onafhankelijk en robuust econometrisch model voor de gehele sector te ontwikkelen om de impact van omzetgenererende marketinginvesteringen te evalueren, optimaliseren en begrijpen bij 14 TOC's, waaronder zowel DFTO als niet-DFTO operators, en nationale activiteiten geleverd door RDG.

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

8 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (1)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (1)
Technisch (4)
Financieel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-27T00:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds were identified in the provided information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements were identified in the provided information.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Ability to develop an independent and robust industry-wide econometric model.
--Capability to evaluate, optimise, and understand the impact of revenue-generating marketing investment.
--Expertise to apply the econometric model across 14 Train Operating Companies (including both DFTO and non-DFTO operators).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements were identified in the provided information.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
006204-2026_ocds_record.json

The Rail Delivery Group seeks a partner to develop an independent and robust industry-wide econometric model for evaluating, optimizing, and understanding the impact of revenue-generating marketing investment across 14 Train Operating Companies and national activities.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
006204-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Rail Delivery Group's tender for an econometric model to evaluate and optimize marketing investment across 14 TOCs.

Official PDF VersionPDF
006204-2026_official.pdf

The Rail Delivery Group is seeking a partner to develop an independent and robust industry-wide econometric model to evaluate, optimise, and understand the impact of revenue-generating marketing investment across 14 train operating companies, with an estimated value of £8 million.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

59
Redelijk

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender presents a clear project description and essential basic information, but it suffers from significant deficiencies in legal compliance, completeness, and fairness due to the absence of critical requirements and evaluation criteria.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving65/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. However, the absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements is a significant concern for legal compliance, despite the 'planning' status.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Duidelijkheid60/100

The project description and technical capability requirements are clear and unambiguous. Nevertheless, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and other crucial requirement types (exclusion, eligibility, financial) severely diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Absence of other key requirement types (eligibility, financial)
Volledigheid55/100

While basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and documents are provided, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Eerlijkheid50/100

The disclosed value and reasonable submission timeframe contribute positively to fairness. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission capabilities significantly undermine the transparency and equal access for all potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission)
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid60/100

The lack of electronic submission is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, the absence of e-submission reduces the overall practicality and ease of participation.

No electronic submission (e-submission)
Gegevensconsistentie85/100

The populated key fields are largely consistent, with logical dates for submission and contract duration. A minor discrepancy exists between the estimated value in EUR and the £8 million mentioned in one document, but this is not a major inconsistency.

Minor discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs GBP in document)
Duurzaamheid25/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a low commitment to sustainability principles within the procurement process.

No green procurement focus
No social criteria

Sterke punten

Clear project description
Estimated value disclosed
Appropriate CPV code provided
Reasonable submission timeframe for preparation
Basic tender information (title, reference, organization, duration, start date) is present

Aandachtspunten

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of electronic submission (e-submission)
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Overall incompleteness of critical tender documentation

Aanbevelingen

1. Publish comprehensive mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements.
2. Clearly define and publish objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Implement electronic submission for improved accessibility and efficiency in the bidding process.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline