Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

HERAANBESTEDING St Marys Muur

Open
Deadline
6 dagen resterend
April 24, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Open Procedure
Referentie
026486-2026
Waarde
£612,000
Locatie
East Anglia, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 10, 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 23, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 17, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 24, 2026

Startdatum contract

Juni 05, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
£612,000
Looptijd
4 maanden
Locatie
East Anglia
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

East Suffolk Council zoekt een aannemer voor de vernieuwing en reparatie van een deel van de zuidelijke grensmuur van het kerkhof van St Mary in Woodbridge, inclusief nieuwe steunberen en poortpijlers voor voertuigen. Dit is een heraanbesteding met wijzigingen in de documentatie.

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

15 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (4)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (2)
Technisch (6)
Financieel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit their tender by the deadline: 2026-04-24T12:00:00+01:00.
--Bidders must adhere to all instructions and requirements outlined in the tender documents.
--Bidders must ensure all required documentation is submitted in the correct format.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by relevant procurement legislation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered and authorized to operate in the relevant jurisdiction.
--Bidders must demonstrate they have the necessary legal and regulatory compliance.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must have proven experience in renewal and repair of boundary walls, including the construction of new buttresses.
--Bidders must have experience in removing existing and constructing new vehicular entrance gate piers and connecting boundary walls.
--Bidders must have experience in re-hanging adapted salvaged gates.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability and capacity to undertake a contract of this value (612,000 EUR).
--Bidders may be required to provide financial statements or other evidence of financial standing.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
026486-2026_ocds_record.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
026486-2026_ocds_release.json

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
026486-2026_official.pdf

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for boundary wall renewal and repair is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is a key component of legal compliance in tender processes.

Missing evaluation criteria
Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the works is detailed and specific, outlining the scope of renewal, repair, and construction. The AI-extracted requirements further clarify technical and financial expectations. The re-tender nature and emphasis on reviewing updated documentation also contribute to clarity, although it necessitates careful bidder attention.

Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of content or summaries for the tender documents is a significant gap, hindering a full assessment of completeness. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria also impacts completeness.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is an open competition, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the process is described as open. The technical requirements are specific to the scope of work and do not appear to be tailored to a single company. The main concern for fairness is the lack of transparency regarding how bids will be evaluated.

No evaluation criteria specified
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and a direct URL to the tender documents reduces practicality. While financing is implied by the estimated value, explicit details are missing. The submission deadline, while present, is noted as potentially short.

No e-submission specified
No direct URL to tender documents
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced. The CPV code is present and relevant.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria within this procurement process.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Sterke punten

Clear and detailed description of works
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Open competition procedure
Relevant CPV code provided

Aandachtspunten

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content/summaries available
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Potential for a short submission deadline

Aanbevelingen

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Provide direct links or accessible summaries of all tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline