Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.
Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.
InloggenUpgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.
Inloggen9 vereisten over 5 categorieën
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen
This OCDS record provides structured data about the Milton Keynes-Northampton 33/X33 Bus Route replacement service tender, detailing the procurement process and requirements.
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data detailing the Milton Keynes City Council's tender for the 33/X33 Bus Route operator, including buyer information and initial tender specifics.
This tender seeks an operator for the Milton Keynes-Northampton 33/X33 Bus Route, offering an initial 1-year contract with two 12-month extension options, and requiring a valid operator license.
Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken
This tender for bus route services demonstrates good basic information and electronic submission capabilities, but is significantly hampered by the absence of detailed quality evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds, impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.
The tender defines the procedure type and assigns a correct CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds is a significant legal compliance issue. Missing procedure codes are a minor detail.
The service description is clear, and eligibility/submission requirements are understandable. However, a major concern is the lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the 'quality' component, despite the 50% weighting being specified. This ambiguity makes it difficult for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals.
Basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. Documents are available. However, critical information such as the liable person, mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed quality evaluation criteria are missing, significantly impacting completeness.
Full document access and electronic submission support contribute positively to fairness. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the absence of detailed quality evaluation criteria severely impacts the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation process, potentially disadvantaging bidders.
Electronic submission is clearly supported with instructions, enhancing practicality. The contract start date and duration are well-defined, and estimated financing is available. This category performs well.
Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include a slight discrepancy in the estimated value (EUR vs. GBP equivalent in tender notice) and the 'Divided into Parts' characteristic not being fully elaborated for a single route. The AI summary also had an internal inconsistency regarding evaluation split, though the tender notice clarified it.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, leading to a low score in this category.
Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken
Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten
Hallo! Ik ben je AI-assistent voor deze aanbesteding. Ik kan je helpen bij het begrijpen van vereisten, deadlines, geschiktheidscriteria en strategische inzichten bieden.
Geen creditcard vereist