Aanbesteding van een contract voor ondersteuning, onderhoud en ontwikkeling van applicaties voor verkeersinformatie en spoorwegbeheer

This tender for IT application support, maintenance, and development by Banedanmark is generally well-structured, with a clear description of services and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of CPV codes and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type is listed as 'None (Code: competition)', which is unusual and could be a minor point of confusion.

The description of the required services, including transition, maintenance, support, and development, is quite detailed. The list of specific applications is helpful. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline. The description is extensive. However, crucial details such as the contract duration and specific contract start date are missing, which affects the overall completeness of the tender documentation.

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for exclusion and eligibility are implicitly defined by the technical requirements. The use of e-procurement is noted. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit information regarding the contract duration and start date, as well as the absence of a direct URL to the full tender documents (beyond a notice reference), reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender publication.

The tender documentation does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding requirements. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.