Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

GLE Major Works Renewal Programme - Professionele diensten na contract

Open
Deadline
76 dagen resterend
Juni 30, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Restricted Procedure
Referentie
011382-2026
Waarde
£1,800,000
Locatie
London, Verenigd Koninkrijk
Gepubliceerd
April 08, 2026
CPV-code
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Februari 09, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

Juni 23, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

Juni 30, 2026

Startdatum contract

Juni 30, 2026

Budget
£1,800,000
Looptijd
135 maanden
Locatie
London
Type
Restricted Procedure
63
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Er worden multidisciplinaire consultantdiensten na contract gezocht ter ondersteuning van het Golden Lane Estate Major Works Renewal Programme. De diensten omvatten Contractbeheer, Werkgeversvertegenwoordiger, Hoeveelhedenopname en Opzichter over RIBA Fasen 4B–7. Dit ondersteunt de grote renovatiewerkzaamheden aan negen monumentale woonblokken, waaronder ramen, daken, brandveiligheid, elektrische conformiteit, ventilatie, decoraties en gevelreparaties, geleverd in meerdere fasen, inclusief processen voor gebouwen met een hoog risico. De aanbesteding zal plaatsvinden via een flexibele concurrentieprocedure, waarbij de opdracht wordt gegund aan de meest voordelige inschrijving.

Risicoanalyse

Risicoanalyse is nog niet beschikbaar voor aanbestedingen uit dit land. Momenteel ondersteund: Estland, Letland, Litouwen, Polen, Frankrijk, VK, Denemarken, Nederland, Noorwegen en Finland.

Winststrategie

Ontvang een AI-gestuurde winnende strategie, afgestemd op deze aanbesteding. Inclusief winstkansscore, belangrijke kansen en uitdagingen, aanbevolen focusgebieden voor de inschrijving, inzichten in concurrentiepositie en actiegerichte aanbevelingen om je kansen te maximaliseren.

Inloggen

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

21 vereisten over 3 categorieën

Indiening (3)
Naleving (9)
Technisch (9)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission by the deadline: 2026-07-01T00:00:00+01:00.
--Participation in a Competitive Flexible Procedure.
--Tender must be prepared to be evaluated based on the Most Advantageous Tender criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Ability to provide multidisciplinary consultant services.
--Ability to provide Contract Administration services.
--Ability to provide Employer’s Agent services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Demonstrated expertise in Contract Administration for post-contract phases.
--Demonstrated expertise as an Employer’s Agent for post-contract phases.
--Demonstrated expertise in Quantity Surveying for post-contract phases.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

3 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

OCDS RecordDOC
011382-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record details the procurement of multidisciplinary consultant services, including Contract Administration, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, for the Golden Lane Estate's major refurbishment program across RIBA Stages 4B–7.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
011382-2026_ocds_release.json

This tender seeks multidisciplinary consultants for post-contract services, including Contract Administration, Employer’s Agent, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, to support the major refurbishment of nine listed residential blocks in London, requiring expertise across RIBA Stages 4B-7 and Higher-Risk Building Gateway processes.

Official PDF VersionPDF
011382-2026_official.pdf

This tender seeks multidisciplinary consultant services, including Contract Administration, Employer’s Agent, Quantity Surveying, and Clerk of Works, for the post-contract phase of a major refurbishment programme for nine listed residential blocks in London, valued at an estimated £1.5 million.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

63
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender provides a clear and detailed project description but suffers from significant gaps in evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission, impacting transparency and practicality. Data inconsistencies, particularly regarding dates, also present a concern.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving80/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, with a clearly defined procedure type and appropriate CPV codes. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the reveal date is missing, and some procedural codes are not populated, representing minor administrative oversights.

Missing reveal date
Some procedural codes are not populated
Duidelijkheid60/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally clear, detailed, and unambiguous, covering services, RIBA stages, and specific works. The critical flaw is the explicit absence of detailed evaluation criteria, which significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how their proposals will be assessed, despite mentioning 'Most Advantageous Tender'.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
Volledigheid65/100

Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location, is provided. Documents are attached and summarized. However, the crucial absence of detailed evaluation criteria makes the tender incomplete from a bidder's perspective. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
Liable Person field is empty
Eerlijkheid60/100

The lack of detailed evaluation criteria severely impacts the transparency and objectivity of the tender process, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and relevant proposals. The absence of an e-submission option also creates a barrier to equal access. While requirements are specific, they appear justified by the project's nature rather than being tailored to a specific company.

No detailed evaluation criteria specified
No electronic submission (e-submission) option
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

The absence of an electronic submission system is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. While the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, the lack of e-submission reduces the overall practicality of the tender process.

No electronic submission (e-submission) option
Gegevensconsistentie55/100

A major inconsistency is the identical submission deadline (2026-06-30 23:00:00) and contract start date (2026-06-30 23:00:00), which is highly illogical. There's also a slight discrepancy between the basic info and AI-extracted submission deadlines. Several key fields like 'Liable Person' and procedural codes are unpopulated, indicating incomplete data entry.

Submission deadline and contract start date are identical
Slight discrepancy in submission deadline between sources
Duurzaamheid30/100

The tender documentation does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus criteria. While the project involves refurbishment, which can have inherent sustainability benefits, these are not framed as procurement objectives or evaluation factors.

No explicit sustainability criteria
No explicit social criteria

Sterke punten

Clear and detailed project description
Specific and comprehensive AI-extracted requirements
All basic tender information (title, reference, organization, value, duration) is provided
CPV codes are appropriately assigned
Documents are available and summarized

Aandachtspunten

Absence of detailed evaluation criteria for 'Most Advantageous Tender'
Lack of electronic submission option
Inconsistency between submission deadline and contract start date
No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
Missing reveal date and some procedural codes

Aanbevelingen

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance accessibility and efficiency of the procurement process.
3. Review and correct all date inconsistencies, especially between the submission deadline and contract start date.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline