Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Bouw van verzorgingstehuis Narva. Ontwerparbeid

Open
Deadline
12 dagen resterend
April 27, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Diensten
Referentie
307948
Waarde
€250,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
Maart 27, 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Beoordelingscriteria
Total design costs100%
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 27, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 20, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 27, 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

April 27, 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€250,000
Looptijd
6 maanden
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Diensten
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€71,415
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.8
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
99%
2,006 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Narva Hooldekodu OÜ wenst een contract af te sluiten voor ontwerparbeid conform de aanbestedingsdocumenten. Om een bod in te dienen, moet de geïnteresseerde partij de locatie bezoeken. De aanbestedende dienst stelt de volgende data vast voor locatiebezoeken: 02.04.2026, 10.00-12.00 uur; 08.04.2026, 14.00-16.00 uur; 15.04.2026, 14.00-16.00 uur. De bieder moet beschikken over BIM-ontwerpmogelijkheden.
Elektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

AI-gestuurde analyse van de vereisten, kansen en uitdagingen van deze aanbesteding. Krijg strategische inzichten om je winstkans te maximaliseren.

60%
Geschatte winstkansMatige match

This tender for Narva Hooldekodu design works is heavily cost-driven, making price the primary evaluation factor. Success hinges on a lean, efficient cost structure and demonstrating BIM capability. While social and green aspects are absent, a strong, compliant team and meticulous adherence to submission requirements are crucial.

Kernboodschappen voor winst

Cost-Effective Design Excellence with Proven BIM Capability

Guaranteed Compliance and Risk-Free Project Delivery

Belangrijke Kansen
Aggressive pricing due to cost-only evaluation.
Demonstrating BIM proficiency as a mandatory requirement.
Leveraging a lean operational model to offer a competitive price.
Early engagement through mandatory site visits.
Belangrijke Uitdagingen
Intense price competition due to cost-only evaluation.

Develop a highly optimized cost model, explore lean resourcing, and ensure all overheads are minimized without compromising quality or compliance. Consider the potential for a 'loss leader' strategy if the long-term pipeline is strong.

Ensuring all mandatory requirements are met precisely, especially the exclusion grounds and team composition.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all bid documents. Assign a dedicated compliance officer to cross-reference all submitted information against the tender requirements. Conduct thorough due diligence on any potential subcontractors (though none are explicitly allowed, this applies to internal team members' contractual status).

Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond cost.

Focus solely on delivering the lowest compliant price. Any perceived 'value-adds' beyond cost are unlikely to be rewarded and could increase bid costs unnecessarily. Ensure the technical submission is robust and clearly demonstrates BIM capability.

Ideaal Inschrijversprofiel
A small to medium-sized design firm with a proven track record in healthcare or residential facilities, possessing strong BIM expertise and a highly efficient operational model that allows for aggressive pricing. They must have a readily available, certified design team and robust processes for ensuring compliance with all mandatory requirements.
Belangrijkste Vereisten
BIM design capability
Absence of exclusion grounds
Design team specialists (Project Manager, Construction, Interior, Electrical, HVAC, Plumbing Engineers) with certifications and contractual relationships
Confirmation of no subcontractors/suppliers linked to the Russian Federation
Lowest price for evaluation
Site visit confirmation
Belangrijkste onderscheidende factoren
Demonstrable BIM expertise and a clear methodology for its application in this specific project type.
A highly competitive price that reflects efficient operations and a clear understanding of the project scope.
A perfectly compliant bid with no ambiguities, demonstrating meticulous attention to detail.
Kansen voor sociale waarde
While not a formal requirement, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment or sustainable design practices if it can be achieved without increasing cost. However, given the cost-only evaluation, this should be a very low priority and only included if it can be done at zero additional cost.
Focusgebieden voor de inschrijving
Cost100%

Develop a highly competitive and lean cost proposal. Conduct thorough cost-benefit analysis for all internal resources and processes to identify areas for optimization. Benchmark against similar projects if possible. Ensure all direct and indirect costs are accurately captured and minimized.

Aanbevelingen6
Mandatory Site Visit Attendance
KritiekLage inspanning

Attend at least one of the mandatory site visit sessions. This is a prerequisite for bidding and provides invaluable context for accurate cost estimation and technical proposal development. Document observations thoroughly.

Enables bid submission and provides critical project understanding.
Aggressive Costing Strategy
KritiekHoge inspanning

Given the 100% cost weighting, develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, identifying all potential cost savings without compromising compliance or quality. Consider the estimated value and duration to ensure profitability.

Maximizes the chance of scoring highest on the evaluation criteria.
BIM Capability Proof
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Clearly articulate and provide evidence of the bidder's BIM design capability. This could include case studies, software certifications, and a description of the team's BIM experience and workflows.

Meets a mandatory technical requirement.
Rigorous Compliance Check
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Implement a stringent internal review process to ensure absolute compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and the prohibition of Russian Federation-linked entities. Any non-compliance will lead to immediate disqualification.

Prevents disqualification.
Clear and Concise Technical Submission
GemiddeldGemiddelde inspanning

While cost is paramount, the technical submission must be clear, concise, and directly address the team requirements. Highlight the experience and certifications of the proposed team members, emphasizing their suitability for this specific project.

Ensures technical compliance and builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver.
Business Secrets Justification
HoogLage inspanning

If any business secrets are to be declared, ensure the justification is robust and clearly articulated as per the tender requirements. Ambiguous or weak justifications could lead to scrutiny.

Avoids potential issues with the contracting authority regarding declared business secrets.
Concurrentiepositie
Position as the most cost-effective, compliant, and BIM-capable provider. Emphasize efficiency and a streamlined approach to deliver the project within budget and on time. Highlight the absence of any compliance risks.

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

7 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (2)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (2)
Technisch (1)
Financieel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must state any business secrets and provide justification.
--Bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must meet the qualification requirements for design turnover, economic status, and have the required design team specialists.
--The bidder must confirm that they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must provide information about their team members, including project manager, construction, interior, electrical, heating, ventilation, cooling, water supply, and sewage engineers, along with their professional certificate numbers and contractual relationships.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet the economic status requirements.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

5 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

VastavustingimusedPDF
307948_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation will be involved and must specify any business secrets and their justification within the bid.

Pakkuja meeskondXLS
projekteerimismeeskonna ülevaade.xlsx -- 10.9 KB

Bidders must provide information about their team members, including project manager, certified construction, interior, electrical, HVAC, and plumbing engineers, along with their certification numbers and contractual relationships.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307948_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate design work bids solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307948_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 8.5 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds and meet qualification requirements for design turnover, financial standing, and a design team with specified specialists.

EskiisZIP
eskiis.zip -- 8.8 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for design services for a care home in Narva is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on cost for evaluation.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The requirement to avoid subcontractors linked to the Russian Federation, while potentially justifiable for security reasons, could be perceived as a specific geopolitical consideration rather than a standard regulatory compliance point.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements for technical capability and team composition are well-documented. The evaluation criteria are stated, although the sole reliance on cost might be a point of discussion. The mandatory site visit is clearly communicated with specific dates.

Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not specified. The number of attached documents is stated, but their full content beyond summaries is not always accessible or analyzed.

Financing information not explicitly detailed
Contract start date not specified
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation criteria are objective, focusing on cost. The requirement to avoid subcontractors associated with the Russian Federation, while potentially having security justifications, could be seen as a specific, non-standard requirement that might indirectly favor certain bidders or limit competition, though it is not explicitly tailored to a single company. The mandatory site visit dates are provided.

Requirement to avoid subcontractors associated with the Russian Federation could be perceived as a specific, non-standard condition.
Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement. However, the contract start date is missing, and financing details are not fully elaborated, which can impact practical planning for bidders. The duration is specified.

Contract start date missing
Financing information not fully elaborated
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical and consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration is clearly stated.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This category scores lower due to the absence of these common sustainability elements.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Sterke punten

Clear project description and technical requirements
E-procurement and electronic submission
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value
Objective evaluation criteria (cost-based)

Aandachtspunten

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Sole reliance on cost for evaluation
Missing contract start date and detailed financing information

Aanbevelingen

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing) into the evaluation.
2. Consider a more balanced evaluation approach beyond just the lowest price to ensure quality.
3. Provide a clear contract start date and more detailed financing information.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Nieuwe Dienst

Laat ons deze aanbesteding voor je verzorgen?

Onze inkoopexperts bereiden alles voor. Bewezen effectief — jij beoordeelt, keurt goed en dient in.

~1hJouw tijd
80%+80%+
$0Vooraf
Volledige vergelijking bekijken
Zonder TaaSMet TaaS
40-80 uur
Voorbereidingstijd
~1 uur
Jouw tijd
15-25%
Gemiddelde winstkans
80%+
Succesratio
Risico op fouten
Handmatige controle
Expert QA
Nalevingcontrole
Jij doet alles
Alles zelf regelen
Wij doen alles
End-to-end service
Laten we deze aanbesteding winnen
Betaal pas als je wint · Meer dan 400 bedrijven vertrouwen ons
Of doe het zelf

Toevoegen aan pipeline