Wil je inschrijven op overheidsaanbestedingen? Bekijk onze TaaS aanbestedingsvoorbereidingsservice
Aanbestedingen

Ontwerp en bouw van een schoollift

Open
Deadline
7 dagen resterend
April 22, 2026
Contractdetails
Categorie
Bouw
Referentie
307915
Waarde
€110,000
Locatie
Estonia, Estland
Gepubliceerd
Maart 23, 2026
Organisatie
CPV-code
Beoordelingscriteria
Total bid cost100%
Projecttijdlijn

Aanbesteding gepubliceerd

Maart 23, 2026

Deadline voor vragen

April 15, 2026

Deadline voor inschrijving

April 22, 2026

Opening van de aanbesteding

April 10, 2026

Startdatum contract

Mei 03, 2026

WinstkansPRO
🔒
Upgrade naar Professional
Bekijk je geschatte winstkans op basis van historische gegevens.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Buyer Intelligence
Bekijk uitgavenpatronen, voorkeursprocedures en meer.
Upgrade naar Professional →
SectorinzichtenPRO
🔒
Ontgrendel Sectorinzichten
Bekijk gemiddelde winnende prijzen, concurrentieniveaus en markttrends.
Upgrade naar Professional →
Budget
€110,000
Looptijd
6 maanden
Locatie
Estonia
Type
Bouw
75
Kwaliteitsscore/100
Goed
Marktbenchmark
Gem. Winnende Prijs
€524,963
Gem. Inschrijvingen
4.7
Concurrentie
Gemiddeld
MKB-winnaars
94%
5,932 geanalyseerde aanbestedingen

Originele aanbestedingsbeschrijving

Het voorwerp van de openbare aanbesteding is het ontwerpen en installeren van een lift in het gebouw van de Turba School, gelegen in het dorp Turba, gemeente Saue, in overeenstemming met de voorwaarden uiteengezet in de aanbestedingsdocumenten. Gedetailleerde voorwaarden voor de uitvoering van de aanbestedingsovereenkomst worden verstrekt in het document "Ontwerp van de aanbestedingsovereenkomst". Kwalificatievereisten en gronden voor uitsluiting worden verstrekt in het document "Aanbestedingspas met aanvullende toelichtingen". Conformiteitsvoorwaarden voor de offerte worden verstrekt in het document "Conformiteitsvoorwaarden".
EU-gefinancierdElektronische indiening

Risicoanalyse uitvoeren

Identificeer potentiële risico's, inconsistenties en rode vlaggen in alle aanbestedingsdocumenten. Ontvang een gedetailleerd risicorapport met ernstniveaus en aanbevelingen voor mitigatie.

Inloggen

Winststrategie

AI-gestuurde analyse van de vereisten, kansen en uitdagingen van deze aanbesteding. Krijg strategische inzichten om je winstkans te maximaliseren.

75%
Geschatte winstkansMatige match

This tender for the Turba School elevator project is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible compliant bid while demonstrating robust technical capability and meticulous attention to submission requirements. Proactive engagement with tender documents and a clear understanding of the evaluation criteria are paramount.

Kernboodschappen voor winst

The most cost-effective and compliant solution for Turba School's lift needs.

Proven expertise in delivering essential school infrastructure projects efficiently.

Belangrijke Kansen
Leveraging economies of scale or preferred supplier relationships for lift components to drive down costs.
Thorough on-site assessment to identify potential cost-saving efficiencies in design and construction, which can be reflected in the bid.
Ensuring absolute compliance with all submission requirements to avoid disqualification, especially given the electronic submission format and specific document formats mentioned.
Belangrijke Uitdagingen
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost evaluation criterion.

Conduct a rigorous cost-down exercise, explore all potential efficiencies in design, procurement, and construction. Consider strategic partnerships for material sourcing if feasible. Ensure no hidden costs are overlooked that could lead to losses.

Potential for errors or omissions in the bid submission, leading to disqualification, especially with complex electronic submission processes and specific document formats.

Implement a multi-stage review process for the bid submission. Assign a dedicated team member to meticulously check all required documents and formats against the tender instructions. Seek clarification from the contracting authority well in advance of the deadline if any submission requirement is unclear.

Ideaal Inschrijversprofiel
A small to medium-sized construction or specialized lift installation company with proven experience in public sector projects, a strong track record in delivering projects on time and within budget, and efficient operational processes that allow for competitive pricing. They should possess the necessary design and engineering expertise for lift shafts and installations.
Belangrijkste Vereisten
Submission of Form 4 – Bid Cost Table with detailed cost data for design and construction works.
Familiarization with the object on-site.
Confirmation of fulfillment of all tender document conditions.
Submission of the make and model of the lift.
Design and construction of the lift, including the lift shaft and obtaining necessary permits.
Belangrijkste onderscheidende factoren
A highly detailed and transparent breakdown of costs in Form 4, demonstrating value for money beyond just the lowest number.
A clear and concise technical proposal that assures the contracting authority of the chosen lift's reliability and suitability for a school environment, even if not explicitly evaluated.
Kansen voor sociale waarde
While not a formal requirement, consider a brief mention of local employment opportunities during the construction phase, if applicable, to subtly align with broader public sector goals.
Focusgebieden voor de inschrijving
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible compliant bid. This requires meticulous cost breakdown in Form 4, identifying all direct and indirect costs, and applying efficient construction methodologies. Every euro saved translates directly to a higher score.

Aanbevelingen5
Aggressively Price to Win
KritiekHoge inspanning

Given the 100% weight on total bid cost, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. This involves detailed cost engineering, exploring all procurement efficiencies, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin to secure the contract.

Directly maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Thorough On-Site Familiarization
KritiekGemiddelde inspanning

Conduct a detailed site visit to fully understand the existing building structure, access points, and any potential complexities in lift shaft construction. This knowledge will inform more accurate and potentially cost-saving design and construction plans.

Reduces risk of unforeseen costs, enables more competitive pricing, and demonstrates commitment.
Meticulous Submission Compliance
KritiekHoge inspanning

Pay extreme attention to all submission requirements, especially the electronic format and specific document templates (Vormid 1-3_näidised.zip, ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml). Ensure all fields in the Hankepass are completed accurately and that Form 4 is detailed and error-free.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Clarify Ambiguities Early
HoogLage inspanning

If any aspect of the tender documents, particularly regarding submission formats or technical specifications, is unclear, proactively seek clarification from the Saue Vallavalitsus well before the deadline. Document all communications.

Avoids misinterpretation and potential bid rejection.
Detailed Technical Justification (Implicit)
GemiddeldGemiddelde inspanning

While not directly evaluated, a clear and concise technical description of the proposed lift (make and model) and construction methodology can build confidence with the contracting authority, subtly reinforcing the value proposition even if cost is paramount.

Enhances perceived reliability and professionalism.
Concurrentiepositie
Position the bid as the most straightforward, cost-effective, and compliant solution, emphasizing efficiency and a clear understanding of the project's core requirement: a functional and affordable lift for the school.

Concurrenten

Upgrade om te zien welke bedrijven waarschijnlijk op deze aanbesteding zullen inschrijven, gebaseerd op historische inkoopgegevens.

Inloggen

Vereisten & Kwalificaties

23 vereisten over 5 categorieën

Indiening (10)
Verplicht (1)
Naleving (5)
Technisch (4)
Financieel (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Bids must be submitted electronically via the procurement environment.
--Must confirm fulfillment of all tender document conditions.
--Must familiarize themselves with the object on-site.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but general compliance with procurement law is implied.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must confirm fulfillment of all tender document conditions.
--Must familiarize themselves with the object on-site.
--Must submit the make and model of the lift.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Design and construction of a lift in the Turba School building.
--Includes the construction of the lift shaft.
--Includes lift installation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total cost of the bid will be the primary evaluation criterion.
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.
--Must submit Form 4 – Bid Cost Table with detailed cost data for design and construction works.

Voorbeeld van vereisten

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Documenten

9 documenten beschikbaar met AI-samenvattingen

VastavustingimusedPDF
307915_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 17.9 KB

Bidders must confirm adherence to all tender document conditions, conduct an on-site inspection, and specify the lift make and model to ensure a compliant bid.

Kas pakkuja on täitnud ja esitanud pakkumuse kogumaksumuse aluseks oleva Vormi 4...XLS
Vorm 4_Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 13.1 KB

Bidders must submit Form 4 – Tender Cost Table, detailing cost data for design and construction works, including the lift make and model.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307915_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307915_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 74.3 KB

The tender pass is an initial confirmation of the company's qualifications and exclusion grounds, to be filled electronically, not submitted.

Menetluse läbiviimise tingimusedDOC
1_Riigihanke alusdokument_Menetluse läbiviimi... -- 38.0 KB

This document outlines the rules and conditions for the simplified procurement procedure, including the electronic procurement environment, obtaining clarifications, and the list of tender base documents required for bid submission.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
2_Riigihanke alusdokument_Tehniline kirjeldus... -- 46.9 KB

The subject of the tender contract is the design and construction of a lift at Turba School to ensure accessibility, including the creation of a lift shaft, installation, and obtaining necessary permits.

Tehniline kirjeldus_LisadZIP
2_Riigihanke alusdokument_Tehniline kirjeldus... -- 2.9 MB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
3_Riigihanke alusdokument_Hankelepingu projek... -- 54.5 KB

The draft contract outlines the general terms, legal acts, and contract documents between the Saue Municipal Government and the contractor for the execution of the school elevator design and construction public procurement.

Vormid 1-3_näidisedZIP
Vormid 1-3_näidised.zip -- 46.5 KB

Geen samenvatting beschikbaar voor dit document.

Voorbeeld van documenten

Meld je aan om document samenvattingen en analyse te bekijken

75
Goed

Kwaliteitsscore aanbesteding

This tender for the design and construction of a lift at Turba School is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion based on price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on external documents for crucial details.

Scoreoverzicht

Wettelijke naleving75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear procedure (LM) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and the process is electronic. No disputes are indicated. The financing conditions are detailed in an external document, which slightly reduces the score.

Duidelijkheid80/100

The description of the tender object is clear, and the requirements are documented in various attached files. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting with the lowest price receiving maximum score. Conditions are generally clear, though some details are deferred to external documents.

Volledigheid70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and contract start date. However, crucial details regarding financing conditions, specific technical specifications, and contract performance conditions are entirely dependent on external documents, impacting overall completeness.

Financing and payment terms are detailed in an external document ('Hankelepingu projekt').
Contract performance conditions are detailed in external documents ('Tehniline kirjeldus' and 'Hankelepingu projekt').
Eerlijkheid85/100

The tender offers full document access through the e-procurement platform. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. The use of e-procurement enhances fairness. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Praktische uitvoerbaarheid65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is provided for the opening place. The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the financing conditions are only available in an external document, which could be a minor inconvenience for bidders.

Financing conditions are only available in an external document.
Gegevensconsistentie90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Duurzaamheid50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as evaluation criteria or requirements.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social aspects criteria.

Sterke punten

Clear technical requirements for lift design and construction.
Objective evaluation criterion based on lowest price.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement environment.
EU funded status.

Aandachtspunten

Reliance on multiple external documents for critical information (financing, contract performance).
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Some document formats (.xml, .zip) are not supported for AI analysis, requiring manual review.

Aanbevelingen

1. Consolidate all essential tender information within the primary tender documents to improve accessibility and completeness.
2. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency of the lift, use of recycled materials) into the evaluation process.
3. Ensure all provided document formats are compatible with standard analysis tools or provide clear instructions for their interpretation.

Voorbeeld van AI-score

Meld je aan om volledige vereisten en analyse te bekijken

Volledige analyse van de kwaliteitsscore
Gedetailleerde uitsplitsing van subscores
Inzichten in sterke en zwakke punten
Strategische aanbevelingen

Geen creditcard vereist • Setup in 2 minuten

Toevoegen aan pipeline