Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.
PrisijungtiAtnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.
Prisijungti13 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Yra 9 dokumentų su AI santraukomis
The contracting authority Rakvere City Government will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.
This tender document outlines requirements for joint bidder power of attorney, bid submission conditions, cost breakdown, bidder confirmations, subcontractor engagement, and equivalency.
This document is an application and confirmation form where the bidder confirms compliance with tender conditions and their desire to participate in the Future Street Reconstruction tender.
The contracting authority presents a cost breakdown list detailing expenses for the design and preparation phases of road reconstruction works.
The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The procurement passport is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence of compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, to be filled out electronically.
This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the terms and obligations for the reconstruction of Tuleviku Street.
The contracting authority provides access to the project documentation for the reconstruction of Tuleviku street, which is necessary for preparing a bid.
This technical specification details the requirements for the reconstruction works of Tuleviku Street, including subcontractor registration, traffic management, and necessary permits.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę
This tender for street reconstruction in Rakvere exhibits good clarity and fairness, with well-defined requirements and a clear evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve practicality in document accessibility.
The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including the provision of a CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure (A) and type (E) are indicated. No immediate regulatory compliance issues are flagged, and the duration of tender validity (3 months) is specified.
The description of the works is clear, referring to specific project documentation, technical specifications, and contract drafts. Evaluation criteria are mentioned ('relative_weighting'), and conditions for bid submission are outlined. Staff qualification is also clearly required.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, some key documents are referred to by number (e.g., 'lisa 2') without direct URLs or immediate accessibility within the provided tender summary, impacting the completeness of readily available information.
The tender generally promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using objective criteria (lowest price). The use of e-procurement and electronic submission enhances accessibility. The criterion for tie-breaking (earlier submission time) is objective. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are positive aspects. The contract start date is clear. However, the accessibility of crucial documents like project documentation ('lisa 2') is described as a link rather than directly embedded or easily downloadable from the main tender notice, which could hinder practical preparation for some bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are consistently populated. No suspension or disputes are indicated, and the provided dates (reveal, submission, opening, contract start) are logical and sequential.
The tender explicitly aims to use funds 'sustainably and rationally' ('säästlikult ja ratsionaalselt'), but there are no specific mentions of green procurement criteria, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which significantly lowers the score in this category.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes
Mūsų viešųjų pirkimų ekspertai parengia viską. Įrodytas sprendimas — jūs peržiūrit, patvirtinate ir pateikiate.
Sveiki! Aš esu jūsų AI asistentas, skirtas šiam konkursui. Galiu padėti jums suprasti reikalavimus, terminus, tinkamumo kriterijus ir pateikti strateginių įžvalgų.
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės