Atgal į konkursus

Dantų priežiūros įrangos prevencinė priežiūra ir remontas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 34 dienų
Balandis 06, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
306754
Vertė
€375,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 27, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Cost of the bid100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 27, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 30, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Balandis 06, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Balandis 06, 2026

Sutarties pradžios data

Gegužė 01, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€375,000
Trukmė
84 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€265,238
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
2.7
Konkurencija
Žema
MVĮ laimėtojai
90%
843 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pirkimo tikslas – sudaryti pagrindinę sutartį dantų priežiūros įrangos prevencinei priežiūrai ir remontui.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

10 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (4)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (3)
Techninis (1)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the cost of preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The tender is not divided into lots as this would lead to additional costs and inefficient use of funds.
--The contract is a framework agreement.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a bidder's pass, which is a self-declaration confirming compliance with the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--Bidders must confirm their acceptance of the tender conditions and that their bid complies with them.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--N/A (No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided summaries).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--N/A (No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided summaries).

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 7 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
306754_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.9 KB

Bidders must confirm that they will not involve subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation in contract performance, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Vorm II - AvaldusDOC
Vorm II_Avaldus.docx -- 17.6 KB

This form is an application to participate in the tender procedure, confirming agreement with the tender conditions and compliance of the bid.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306754_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306754_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.4 KB

The tender pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary proof of meeting the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements, to be filled out electronically.

Juhised pakkujalePDF
Juhised pakkujale.pdf -- 232.4 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the public procurement for preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment, clarifying the procurement procedure, participation restrictions, and submission requirements.

Lisa 1 - RaamlepingPDF
Lisa 1_Raamleping.pdf -- 211.4 KB

This document is a framework agreement template outlining the terms for preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment and its integral parts.

Vorm I - Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm I_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 18.6 KB

This document is a joint bidder authorization, designating one joint bidder to represent others in submitting the bid and concluding the contract.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for preventive maintenance and repair of dental equipment is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor documentation completeness gaps.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are specified, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are noted. The exclusion ground related to Russian Federation connections is a specific regulatory requirement that is addressed.

Aiškumas80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear. Requirements are documented, and the primary evaluation criterion (cost) is specified. The conditions for participation, including exclusion grounds and eligibility, are outlined.

Užbaigtumas70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, specific technical and financial capability requirements are not detailed in the provided summaries, which could be a point of concern for potential bidders needing to assess their suitability.

Missing detailed technical capability requirements
Missing detailed financial requirements
Sąžiningumas85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines appear reasonable. The primary evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The restriction of 'Max Participants: 1' is unusual and could be perceived as limiting competition, though it might be justified by the nature of a framework agreement. The exclusion of subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation is a specific geopolitical requirement, not necessarily unfair if applied universally.

Max Participants: 1 could limit competition
Praktiškumas65/100

E-submission is mandated. A document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not detailed. The contract duration is long (84 months), which is a significant commitment.

Financing information not detailed
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Tvarumas50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Privalumai

Clear tender objective and scope
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Clear exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements

Problemos

Lack of detailed technical and financial capability requirements
Absence of sustainability considerations
Potential limitation on competition with 'Max Participants: 1'

Rekomendacijos

1. Provide detailed technical and financial capability requirements for bidders.
2. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
3. Clarify the rationale for 'Max Participants: 1' or consider increasing this limit if feasible.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“