Atgal į konkursus

Autobusų stotelių plėtra Jėgevos savivaldybėje

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 7 dienų
Kovas 10, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
305926
Vertė
€101,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 10, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total bid cost100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 10, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 03, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 10, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 10, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€101,000
Trukmė
5 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
79
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Plėtros veikla 10 autobusų stotelėse Jėgevos savivaldybėje, įskaitant naujų laukimo paviljonų įrengimą 7 stotelėse ir privažiavimo tako statybą dviejose stotelėse.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

15 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (6)
Privalomas (3)
Atitiktis (4)
Techninis (1)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-10 10:00:00.
--The bidder must electronically fill out the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The bidder must define and justify any business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--The bidder must not fall under the exclusion grounds as specified in the ESPD.
--The bidder must confirm that no subcontractors subject to exclusion grounds (e.g., fraud, money laundering) will be involved.
--Subcontractors must not fall under exclusion grounds (e.g., fraud, money laundering).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must meet the qualification requirements specified in the ESPD.
--The bidder must prove the compliance and equivalence of the bid with the tender documents.
--If relying on the resources of another entity, the bidder must meet the specified conditions for such reliance.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must be capable of acting as the main contractor for the construction of bus stop shelters, responsible for performing all construction works or organizing them.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid must include a detailed price offer for various works and costs (e.g., road maintenance, temporary works, earthworks, construction preparation) as part of the cost table.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 7 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305926_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking first-tier subcontractors during contract execution, detailing exclusion grounds (e.g., fraud, money laundering) and requiring tenderers to provide relevant information about themselves and their subcontractors.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305926_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.7 KB

This document requires bidders to define and justify any business secrets, confirm they will not involve subcontractors subject to exclusion, and attest to the compliance and equivalence of their offer with the tender documents.

Pakkja peab esitama lisa 3- maksumuse tabeliXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumuse tabel (10 peatust).xlsx -- 129.9 KB

Bidders must submit a completed cost table detailing the price proposal for various works and expenses, including road maintenance, temporary works, earthworks, and construction preparation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305926_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The sole evaluation criterion for tender offers is the total bid cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum number of points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305926_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.8 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) template, outlining the requirements for bidder qualifications and exclusion grounds, which must be completed electronically.

juhised pakkujaleDOC
Hankedokument_Juhised pakkujale.docx -- 35.1 KB

This document provides general instructions for tenderers, clarifies the scope of the main contracting for bus stop waiting shelters, and sets out conditions for relying on the resources of another entity, including requirements for joint liability and submission of necessary documents.

Lisa 2. Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 47.0 KB

This document is a draft contract for the construction works of Jõgeva municipality bus stop development, outlining the general terms and obligations between the client and the contractor.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

79
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for bus stop development in Jõgeva municipality demonstrates good legal compliance and fairness, with clear requirements and objective evaluation criteria. However, the inability to analyze several key documents limits a full assessment of completeness and clarity.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams90/100

The tender adheres to national procurement regulations, utilizing standard procedures (Open Procedure) and the ESPD. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriately assigned. No disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating strong legal compliance.

Aiškumas80/100

The project description, requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly stated. The AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. However, the content of several important documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans) could not be analyzed, potentially leaving some details unassessed.

Content of several key documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans) could not be analyzed by AI, potentially impacting full clarity assessment.
Užbaigtumas65/100

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are comprehensively provided. While 12 documents are listed, the inability to process 5 of them (including technical specifications and project documents) means the full scope of information is not accessible for analysis, thus limiting the assessment of overall completeness.

Five out of twelve tender documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans, ESPD XML) were not supported for AI analysis, preventing a comprehensive review of their content.
Sąžiningumas90/100

The tender exhibits high fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). The requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and e-procurement is enabled.

Praktiškumas75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and financing information is available. The duration is clearly specified. A minor practical concern is the absence of a specific contract start date, which could aid bidder planning.

Specific contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Duomenų nuoseklumas95/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent throughout the provided information, indicating high data integrity.

Tvarumas40/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While co-financed, it is not explicitly stated as EU-funded in a way that would mandate higher sustainability standards.

Absence of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.
Not explicitly stated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.

Privalumai

Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Reasonable submission deadlines and electronic submission support.
Good legal compliance with standard procedures and ESPD use.
Value disclosed and requirements appear generic, promoting fairness.

Problemos

Inability to analyze content of several key tender documents (e.g., technical specification, project plans).
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Absence of a specific contract start date.

Rekomendacijos

1. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in AI-analyzable formats for future tenders.
2. Consider incorporating specific sustainability, social, or innovation criteria where applicable.
3. Provide a clear estimated contract start date for better planning by bidders.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“