Atgal į konkursus

Tartu Veeriku mokyklos ir sporto salės projektavimas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 14 dienų
Kovas 16, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
304469
Vertė
€420,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 13, 2026
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Cost60%
Portfolio quality30%
Designer's experience in school building projects10%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 13, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 09, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 16, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 16, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€420,000
Trukmė
17 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
82
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Puikiai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€71,415
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.8
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
99%
2,006 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pirkimo sutarties dalykas – generalinio rangovo pagrindinėje sutartyje numatyta Tartu, Veeriku g. 41, esančio mokyklos pastato rekonstrukcijos ir greta esančios naujos sporto salės (Veeriku g. 43) projektavimas.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

16 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (4)
Privalomas (2)
Atitiktis (5)
Techninis (4)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit confirmations and explanations regarding Russia sanctions.
--Bidders must declare business secrets.
--Bidders must complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not be subject to Russia sanctions.
--Bidders must meet the exclusion grounds specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit a power of attorney for joint bids.
--Bidders must meet the qualification conditions specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Bidders must be capable of taking responsibility for obtaining necessary permits as per the contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a high-quality portfolio.
--Bidders must have experience in designing school buildings.
--Bidders must be capable of fulfilling the scope of work for the design of Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be capable of meeting the financial terms of the procurement contract.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 6 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

VastavustingimusedPDF
304469_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.4 KB

This document outlines tenderer requirements concerning Russian sanctions, power of attorney for joint tenders, and the declaration of business secrets, requiring tenderers to provide corresponding confirmations and explanations.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304469_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.8 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall design tender, covering cost (60%), portfolio quality (30%), and the designer's experience in school building projects (10%).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304469_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.0 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the exclusion grounds and qualification conditions for the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall design tender, which bidders must complete electronically.

AllutamislepingDOC
Allutamisleping.docx -- 32.7 KB

This document is a subordination agreement regulating the cooperation and relationships between the designer and the builder of Tartu Veeriku School with the client during the preparation of the work project, to ensure a high-quality final outcome.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 86.5 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the design services of the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall, detailing special conditions, scope of work, permit responsibilities, timelines, and financial terms.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 43.0 KB

This document provides additional information regarding the tender for the design of Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall, offering further clarifications and context to bidders.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

82
Puikiai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This is a well-structured and transparent tender for design services, demonstrating strong legal compliance and fairness. While comprehensive in its requirements and evaluation, it lacks explicit sustainability or social considerations.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams90/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, with a clearly defined procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and explicit checks for Russia sanctions and ESPD exclusion grounds. The submission deadline of 32 days is reasonable, and no disputes or suspensions are noted.

Aiškumas85/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and understandable. Evaluation criteria are clearly specified with relative weightings, and performance conditions are referenced to a specific document.

Užbaigtumas80/100

All essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined. While two documents (XML/ZIP) were not AI-analyzed, their presence indicates a comprehensive tender package.

Sąžiningumas90/100

The tender exhibits high fairness with a disclosed estimated value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, and the qualification requirements, such as experience in designing school buildings, appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Praktiškumas75/100

Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract duration and financing information are specified or referenced. However, an explicit contract start date is not provided, and direct document URLs are not listed in the basic information.

Explicit contract start date not provided.
Direct document URLs not listed in basic information.
Duomenų nuoseklumas95/100

All key fields are populated, and the dates provided for the timeline are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating high data integrity.

Tvarumas30/100

The tender does not explicitly include criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social aspects.

Privalumai

Clear and comprehensive requirements and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance, including EU/national regulations and sanctions checks.
Transparency in value, deadlines, and e-procurement.
Well-structured and consistent data.
Reasonable submission deadline (32 days).

Problemos

Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Two documents (XML/ZIP) were not AI-analyzed, potentially hiding details.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Rekomendacijos

1. Integrate sustainability, social, and innovation criteria into future tenders to align with modern procurement best practices.
2. Ensure all tender documents are in easily processable formats for comprehensive analysis.
3. Consider providing an estimated contract start date for better planning by bidders.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“