Rothay parko modulinis atnaujinimas

This tender for Rothay Park Modular Refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a defined scope. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure for below-threshold open competition. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is a point of concern. No disputes are noted. The value classification is present.

The description of the works is clear and detailed, outlining the scope of refurbishment, supply and installation of a modular unit, and associated groundwork. Technical requirements are well-defined, and compliance standards are specified.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of explicit submission requirements and the lack of content in the tender documents reduce its completeness.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not explicitly detailed for evaluation, are generally objective in nature (e.g., technical capability, compliance). There is no indication of tailored requirements for specific companies.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of document content reduce its practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited emphasis on sustainability criteria.