TEN TORS valdymo informacinės sistemos, sekimo įrenginių ir svetainės teikimas

This tender offers a good foundation with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall quality.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear procedure and a specified CPV code. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a typical range for open procedures. No disputes are reported, contributing to a good score.

The title and description are clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of the expected documentation. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback for clarity.

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and contract start date. However, the lack of accessible tender document content is a major gap, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad accessibility. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially tight, is not inherently unfair. The absence of specific company tailoring is positive. The lack of e-submission is a minor detractor.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of an e-submission option and the absence of financing information reduce its practicality for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, resulting in a moderate score in this category.