Baldų pristatymas ir montavimas VSIA „Piejūras slimnīca“ reikmėms

This tender for furniture supply and installation is generally well-structured, but suffers from undisclosed value and a lack of explicit evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and clarity. Sustainability aspects are not addressed.

The tender adheres to open procedure, provides a CPV code, and appears regulatory compliant. Deadlines are reasonable, and while no disputes are noted, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria could indirectly affect legal recourse.

The description of the procurement is clear, but the document structure implies requirements are detailed across multiple documents. The significant concern is the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, leaving bidders unsure of how proposals will be assessed.

Basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, leaving gaps in essential financial and temporal information.

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' mentioned in issues and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria raise concerns about full transparency and objective assessment. Disclosure of value is also absent.

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs. However, there is no explicit mention of a contract start date, and the financing information is not detailed, limiting practicality. The restriction of document access also hampers practical application.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logically sequenced. The consistency is high.

The tender is EU funded, which is a positive indicator, but there is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability.