Horsforth Featherbank pradinės mokyklos vidinių konstrukcijų remontas

This tender for internal structural repairs at Horsforth Featherbank Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear descriptions and submission procedures. However, the extremely short turnaround time and lack of detailed evaluation criteria present significant concerns.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and organization details. Deadlines are specified, though their reasonableness is questionable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is 'Below threshold - open competition', which is a valid classification.

The description of the required works is clear, outlining the need for structural internal support and associated refurbishment. Requirements for submission and the reason for urgency are well-documented. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria impacts the clarity of the selection process.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are provided. However, the lack of available tender documents with content limits completeness.

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. E-submission via Jaggaer is mandated, which is a positive aspect of fairness. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be perceived as a fairness concern, though the urgency and nature of the work might imply a focus on immediate availability and capability. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

E-submission via Jaggaer is a practical approach. The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not detailed. The extremely short turnaround time for submission and completion, while explained by H&S risks, presents a significant practical challenge for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, with the submission deadline preceding the contract start date. No suspension or disputes are indicated.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria within this tender.