Tikslinės Karjeros Informacijos, Patarimų ir Pagalbos Tarnyba

This tender for a careers information service is well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, and the deadline appears tight.

The tender exhibits good legal compliance with a clear CPV code and a specified organization. The absence of disputes and suspensions contributes positively. However, the submission deadline of March 12, 2026, for a contract starting January 10, 2027, might be considered tight by some potential bidders, impacting the 'reasonable deadlines' aspect.

The description of the service is clear, and the objective of procuring a careers information, advice, and guidance service is well-defined. The mention of market engagement events also adds clarity to the pre-tender process. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The contract start date is also specified. However, the absence of content for the tender documents and the lack of specific eligibility or financial requirements detract from its completeness.

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and indicating the possibility of market engagement events, allowing potential providers to prepare. The objective of seeking experience in similar services is reasonable. The lack of specific tailored requirements to particular companies is a positive. However, the absence of explicit e-submission details and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

The tender specifies the contract start date and duration, which are practical considerations. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of a document URL for accessing the full tender package limit its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline between the submission deadline and contract start date, while potentially tight, is not inherently inconsistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score.