Langų ir balkono durų keitimas plastiko blokais (Skelbiama apklausa)

This tender for window and balcony door replacement is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard open procedure. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

The tender follows a standard open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. While deadlines are present, the short submission window might be a concern. No disputes are reported. The procedure itself appears compliant with EU directives.

The description of the works is clear. The attached documents, including technical specifications and draft contract, provide detailed requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria impacts clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The required documents are attached.

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. All documents are accessible, and the value is disclosed (though not the estimated value). Criteria are objective in principle, but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria reduces transparency. E-procurement is indicated.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. A contract duration is specified. However, the financing information is not disclosed, and the contract start date is not explicitly stated, which could hinder practical planning for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The data appears consistent.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender does not appear to be EU funded based on the available data.