Pakruojo miesto fontano remonto darbų viešasis pirkimas

This tender for fountain repair in Pakruojis is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a straightforward process. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to regulatory requirements with a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. Deadlines are provided, although the submission deadline might be considered tight given the contract duration. The procedure is open and appears compliant.

The description of the works is clear, and the tender documents are available. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means that the conditions for awarding the contract are not explicitly documented, which could be clearer.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description is present. Deadlines and contract duration are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for a complete tender.

The tender is open, and the e-procurement characteristic suggests a degree of fairness. There are no explicitly tailored requirements to specific companies. The lack of disclosed value and evaluation criteria prevents a full assessment of objective criteria, but no overt unfairness is apparent.

While e-procurement is mentioned, the specific method of e-submission is not detailed. Financing information and a precise contract start date beyond the duration are not provided, and there is no URL for the full tender documents, reducing overall practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and dates are populated. The tender is active with no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically presented.

The tender is EU funded, which implies certain oversight, but there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its sustainability focus.