Elektrinių funkcinių lovų su čiužiniais pirkimas (12186)

This tender for electric functional beds is generally well-structured, but lacks transparency regarding financial aspects and evaluation criteria, impacting its overall quality. It adheres to standard procurement procedures but could benefit from clearer sustainability considerations.

The tender adheres to the EU open procedure (2014/24/ES) and specifies a valid CPV code. The procedure type is clearly indicated as 'OPEN'. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions and the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria prevent a higher score. Regulatory compliance is presumed given the EU directive reference.

The title and description are clear, and the procurement documents provide substantial detail on technical specifications and bidder requirements. The mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes the ultimate decision-making process less clear.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, CPV, and contract duration. However, a significant omission is the Estimated Value, which impacts completeness. The tender duration and validity period are specified. Three tender documents are attached, with summaries indicating their content.

The tender is published as an open procedure, promoting broad participation. All required documents appear to be accessible. The use of e-procurement is indicated. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as limiting fairness, as potential bidders may not fully understand the financial scope or the basis for selection. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

The tender indicates 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic, suggesting an electronic submission process, although a direct e-submission URL is not explicitly provided within the given data. The contract duration is 11 months, which is reasonable. Financing information and a specific contract start date are not detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated and appear consistent. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, opening date) are logically ordered. The tender validity period aligns with the submission timeline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, nor is it indicated as EU funded. While not mandatory for all tenders, the absence of these elements limits the sustainability score.