Rokiškio RK garo katilo Nr.3 dūmų recirkuliacijos įrengimo darbai (skelbiama apklausa)

This tender for flue gas recirculation installation is generally well-structured, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the procedure type.

The description of the required work (design and install flue gas recirculation) is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and contract duration are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are not detailed within the provided AI-extracted sections, suggesting they might be within the attached documents.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent. The AI-extracted requirements are generic, implying detailed criteria are in documents, which is standard but could be improved by summarizing key aspects.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive. However, the AI-extracted information does not explicitly confirm e-submission functionality or provide a direct URL for documents. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.