Paprastojo remonto darbų Vilniuje pirkimas supaprastinto atviro konkurso būdu

This tender for simple renovation works in Vilnius is generally well-structured, with a good number of supporting documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and clarity.

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures for an open tender (2014/24/ES). The CPV code is appropriate. While no disputes are noted, the absence of a reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope.

The description of the works is clear, and numerous documents are provided, including technical specifications and plans. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of procedure, and contract duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. A substantial number of documents are attached, contributing to completeness.

The tender appears fair, with full document access and objective criteria implied by the provision of technical specifications and plans. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', but specific details on the e-submission process are not evident. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, reducing the practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported, indicating good data consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The funding source is not specified, and it is not explicitly stated as EU funded.