Keltų elektros, signalizacijos, automatikos sistemų ir jų komponentų priežiūra ir remontas

This tender for ferry systems maintenance and repair is largely compliant with basic procurement standards, but lacks detail on evaluation criteria and sustainability aspects. The estimated value is low for the duration.

The tender appears to follow a standard open procedure and includes a CPV code. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a 'reveal date' (if applicable in this context) raises minor concerns regarding procedural transparency. The deadline for submission is two weeks from the date provided, which could be considered tight depending on the complexity of the required documentation, but is not explicitly flagged as unreasonable within the provided information.

The description of the services required is basic, and while it mentions 'tender documents' are available, the specific requirements for eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are not detailed within the provided text. This lack of explicit detail in the AI-extracted requirements section makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand all necessary qualifications.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code are present. The existence of three tender documents is noted. However, the crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and specific mandatory/eligibility requirements are not detailed in the provided extract, impacting overall completeness.

The tender is characterized as 'E-Procurement', suggesting a level of fairness and accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is 'open'. No specific company tailoring is apparent. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation could potentially lead to less transparent decision-making.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive for e-submission. A contract duration of 24 months is specified. However, information regarding the specific contract start date is missing, and financing details are not provided. The estimated value of 16,000 EUR for a 24-month contract might be considered low, potentially impacting the practicality or attractiveness of the tender.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logically ordered. The CPV code and NUTS code are present.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The fact that it is not explicitly EU funded (though the procedure code suggests it's based on EU directives) might also contribute to a lack of stated sustainability focus.