Tiesioginių išmokų ir kitų Lietuvos žemės ūkio ir kaimo plėtros 2023–2027 m. strateginio plano

This tender for evaluation consulting services is generally well-structured with a clear CPV code and EU funding. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has a potentially short submission deadline, impacting practicality.

The tender adheres to general EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and has a clear CPV code. The procedure is open. While no specific disputes are noted, the absence of a 'reveal date' for opening is a minor procedural oversight. The deadline, while present, might be considered short given the document volume.

The core service description is stated to be in the procurement documents, which is standard. However, the explicit mention of 'Missing evaluation criteria' in the issues section indicates a lack of clarity in the provided summary, although the documents themselves might contain this information. The presence of numerous specific annexes (SPS 1-17) suggests detailed requirements are available within the documentation.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. A significant number of documents (20 total) are provided, suggesting comprehensive details are available. However, the 'AI-extracted requirements' section shows no specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, or submission requirements, which is a significant gap if these are not detailed within the numerous attached documents.

The tender is an open procedure, and the value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is noted. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The availability of a large number of detailed documents (SPS annexes) suggests a fair process for bidders to understand the scope.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The submission deadline of April 9, 2026, for a tender with 20 documents, including technical specifications and qualification requirements, might be considered short, especially if the 'reveal date' is indeed missing. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, opening date) are logical in sequence. The contract duration is specified.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided summary, leading to a moderate score in this category.